DECONSTRUCTING CREATION?
I've heard a lot of screaming about George Lucas and the handling of the Star Wars Universe other the years. Even more so due to the dismal reviews being handed out for the new Clone Wars CGI Cartoon released this week.
A question was raised by someone (Ok, Valerie D'Orazio on her Occasional Superheroine blog) wondering if Lucas actually OWES us (the fans) anything when it comes to concessions on how the Star Wars Universe is handled.
This is quite a dilemma... choosing between the obvious freedom a creator really MUST have with the worlds and characters he creates and the crowd demands that the path he/she leads those worlds down be what the crowd wants and expects.
I think ANY good creator needs to reconize how important fans are to ongoing success of a franchise and be willing to alter or adjust to keep those fans somewhat happy, but I also believe that the creator's own insistance that the worlds follow his/her desinated path no matter how anyone else feels about is a creator's right and even obligation.
When it comes to Star Wars, I'm not nearly as outraged as many other about how things have been handled over the years. It's been obvious to me that Lucas did NOT had as much planned out as we were led to believe back in the 1980s. Besides contridictions and seemingly changes in facts, timelines and events, things just feel different than we were led to beleive in the 80s when we heard about all the backstory.
The problem is, that we... as fans... feel that we OWN the aforementioned worlds and characters because of how much they touched us and meant to us as we were growing up. However, we tend to forget that the person who actually gave those worlds and characters life really should know their own creations better than us.
I remember when Thomas Harris' fourth novel HANNIBAL came out and there was an outrage about the ending (the novel, not the hollywood ending the movie put on it) and what happened with Clarise Starling. Peopole screamed about how Starling would never have acted a certain way or made the decisions she did or allow her to be lead in the direction that Lector led her in.
I remember thinking to myself "So after just one novel and perhaps spending a couple of hours with a character, the readers feel they know her better than the man who spent YEARS with her in writing and creating her?"
That's the problem... we all think we know better than the person who was the creator.
Lucas did a lousy job with a lot of the Star Wars mythos. I totally agree.
However, if HE is satisfied with how things turned out... maybe we should be willing to accept the fact that things went in the direction that was meant to be... in the creator's mind.
Not an easy thing to do, that's for sure.
Thursday, August 21, 2008
Tuesday, July 08, 2008
OH, THANK GOD
I almost died twice this weekend.
Why? Ask Billy Wagner.
Sunday night's blown save was unreal. At the time I was sitting in a Luxery Box in Citibank Park (the stadium for the Long Island Ducks) thanks to a set of tickets won by my son Tyler. We had the sliding doors open and the Ducks game in front of us, with SNY on the tv inside next to us.
Needless to say, about 12 minutes after the Ducks took a 3-0 lead in the bottom of the 8th inning, the Mets blew their 2-0 lead in the 9th.
Thankfully, Joe Smith was great and Fernando Tatis came through again to propel them to a 12 inning win.
Then last night... what should have been a laugher turned into a heart attack waiting to happen.
When the score was 10-2, I made the mistake of joking to a friend "Only an eight run lead? probabally not enough."
Imagine my horror that I was almost right.
Couple of things about last night's game:
1 - Ryan Howard's hit was NOT a home run. The fam CLEARLY interfered with the ball and reached into the realm of play. The original call was correct... and why it was overturned made NO sense.
That's THREE blown calls on Home Runs that have gone against the Mets. Unreal.
2 - Betran's throw to 3rd was ill-advised, but I'm not too pissed he tried it. He has a great arm and it wasn't a horrible play (although his attidute after the game was a little annoying).
In the end, the Mets won 3 out of 4 (and almost swept the series losing a heart-breaker on Friday night) and are only 2 games back in the loss column.
My gut says they will go into the all-star break one game out of first.
In any case, good job winning those games guys... even though you almost killed me doing it.
I almost died twice this weekend.
Why? Ask Billy Wagner.
Sunday night's blown save was unreal. At the time I was sitting in a Luxery Box in Citibank Park (the stadium for the Long Island Ducks) thanks to a set of tickets won by my son Tyler. We had the sliding doors open and the Ducks game in front of us, with SNY on the tv inside next to us.
Needless to say, about 12 minutes after the Ducks took a 3-0 lead in the bottom of the 8th inning, the Mets blew their 2-0 lead in the 9th.
Thankfully, Joe Smith was great and Fernando Tatis came through again to propel them to a 12 inning win.
Then last night... what should have been a laugher turned into a heart attack waiting to happen.
When the score was 10-2, I made the mistake of joking to a friend "Only an eight run lead? probabally not enough."
Imagine my horror that I was almost right.
Couple of things about last night's game:
1 - Ryan Howard's hit was NOT a home run. The fam CLEARLY interfered with the ball and reached into the realm of play. The original call was correct... and why it was overturned made NO sense.
That's THREE blown calls on Home Runs that have gone against the Mets. Unreal.
2 - Betran's throw to 3rd was ill-advised, but I'm not too pissed he tried it. He has a great arm and it wasn't a horrible play (although his attidute after the game was a little annoying).
In the end, the Mets won 3 out of 4 (and almost swept the series losing a heart-breaker on Friday night) and are only 2 games back in the loss column.
My gut says they will go into the all-star break one game out of first.
In any case, good job winning those games guys... even though you almost killed me doing it.
Thursday, June 12, 2008
GOING OUT ON A LIMB
Yep, that's what I'm going to do.
After sixty-four games, the Mets stand at a record of 31-33. They are in tied for third place with the Braves and are six and a half games out of first (behind the Phillies).
They are actually worse off in the wild card standings. They are seven and a half games behind the wild card leading Cardinals (who just lost Albert Pujlos for three plus weeks). There are
four teams ahead of them in the Wild card standing and two other teams tied with them.
To be fair, however, four of those teams (The Astros, Marlins, Pirates and The Cards) are not going to be around all season and another (the Braves) lost their best overall pitcher for the season and lost another starter (Tom Glavine) for a few weeks.
In any case, I'm going to make a baseless prediction.
The Mets are making the Playoffs.
The Mets themselves have no shown me really anything to give me this feeling... it's just a feeling.
I think this team has a huge hot streak in them. I won;t claim to know when... but this prediction comes with the feeling that they will rip off a streak in which they will win something along the lines of 21 of 30 games.
A team with Wright, Reyes, Beltran, Santana, Maine and Pedro is not an under .500 team.
Despite the fact I honestly do not think Willie Randolph is the right man for the Mets manager's job, I think this team will put in together enough to make a run and make the post season.
Mark your books. You get to come back here in October and make fun of me if I'm wrong, but somehow... for some bizarre reason... I don't think I am.
Yep, that's what I'm going to do.
After sixty-four games, the Mets stand at a record of 31-33. They are in tied for third place with the Braves and are six and a half games out of first (behind the Phillies).
They are actually worse off in the wild card standings. They are seven and a half games behind the wild card leading Cardinals (who just lost Albert Pujlos for three plus weeks). There are
four teams ahead of them in the Wild card standing and two other teams tied with them.
To be fair, however, four of those teams (The Astros, Marlins, Pirates and The Cards) are not going to be around all season and another (the Braves) lost their best overall pitcher for the season and lost another starter (Tom Glavine) for a few weeks.
In any case, I'm going to make a baseless prediction.
The Mets are making the Playoffs.
The Mets themselves have no shown me really anything to give me this feeling... it's just a feeling.
I think this team has a huge hot streak in them. I won;t claim to know when... but this prediction comes with the feeling that they will rip off a streak in which they will win something along the lines of 21 of 30 games.
A team with Wright, Reyes, Beltran, Santana, Maine and Pedro is not an under .500 team.
Despite the fact I honestly do not think Willie Randolph is the right man for the Mets manager's job, I think this team will put in together enough to make a run and make the post season.
Mark your books. You get to come back here in October and make fun of me if I'm wrong, but somehow... for some bizarre reason... I don't think I am.
Wednesday, June 11, 2008
I DON'T GET IT
...I really don't. a 5 -1 lead over the Diamondbacks turns into a 9 - 5 loss. The Mets looked in total control over the first 4 innings or so. Yet Willie did it again and pulled Maine after the 5th instead of just letting the guy throw more than 100 pitches. The friggin guy is young and strong. I understand his pitch counts have been kind of high lately, but the guy can survive the occasional 125 pitch game.
Maine was a little wild, but looked solid enough that he should have still pitched the 6th. Vargas didn't look terrible, but wasn't on his game and gave up a big two-out hit to tie the game.
And the Mets, who were hitting the cover off the ball in the first three innings just plain stopped hitting after Owens left the game.
This team is bizarre. I do not know how to classify them. They should be like... eight games over .500. Instead they are three games under and in another tail-spin.
At this point, with all of the under-achieving, the team needs a change.
Something... the manager, the coaches or onoe of the higher profile players needs to be sent packing.
Something needs to shick this team in. It's become late. Time to act before it's TOO late.
...I really don't. a 5 -1 lead over the Diamondbacks turns into a 9 - 5 loss. The Mets looked in total control over the first 4 innings or so. Yet Willie did it again and pulled Maine after the 5th instead of just letting the guy throw more than 100 pitches. The friggin guy is young and strong. I understand his pitch counts have been kind of high lately, but the guy can survive the occasional 125 pitch game.
Maine was a little wild, but looked solid enough that he should have still pitched the 6th. Vargas didn't look terrible, but wasn't on his game and gave up a big two-out hit to tie the game.
And the Mets, who were hitting the cover off the ball in the first three innings just plain stopped hitting after Owens left the game.
This team is bizarre. I do not know how to classify them. They should be like... eight games over .500. Instead they are three games under and in another tail-spin.
At this point, with all of the under-achieving, the team needs a change.
Something... the manager, the coaches or onoe of the higher profile players needs to be sent packing.
Something needs to shick this team in. It's become late. Time to act before it's TOO late.
Tuesday, June 03, 2008
STRANGE DAYS
The Mets are a weird team. It's hard to really define them so far this year... but despite all of their flaws (Delgado, Hielman, Perez, injuries, Willie, etc) they are only 3.5 games out of first and actually are looking pretty decent the last week.
There are a lot of things that look positive for them... Beltran starting to turn it on, the team's record in games started by Santana and Maine, the hitting and play of Reyes, Wright and Church, The continued success of Wagner, Sanchez and Shoenwiez... plus the fact that they had a stretch of 5-12 (with only the Yankee series being a good one) and are no more than 3.5 games out. Their run scored/runs given up diffiental is actually that of a much better team than their record shows and that is a good sign because it means that odds are thier record will adjust to those numbers and winning streaks are coming.
I think this team has under-achieved BIG time. I also think they have a big time hot streak in them.
I have my doubts about Willie Randolph. I think I prefer the (almost frienzied) antics of a Bobby V type manager. I'm NOT saying I want Booby V back. I liked him a lot, but I also reconize that he was always looking to put his stamp on a game and that bit the Mets at times. I'm NOT blaming the issues this year (and last) all on Willie.. but... I have my doubts about him.
I'm actually more concerned about the Braves than I am about the Phillies or Marlins. The Marlins are NOT for real. Sorry... but I do NOT believe it. Remember the Nationals' first year in Washington? Remember they were in 1st place going into the weekend of the All-Star break? Remember they finished FOURTH that year? That's the Marlins this year. The Phillies have an EXCELLENT offense... Utley is a total stud and Burrell looks very good this year so far. Howard and Rollins, while I do not think they will equal their massive numbers of last year, are at the tops of their positions hitting wise and with some decent personel surrounding them, I doubt the Phillies will have any major scoring droughts this year. However, their pitching is... well... it's bad. Simpley put... right now that really only have one guy in their starting five that is really a guy to worry about (Cole Hamels) and he's not only an injury risk.... he's also having a tad of an uneven stretch. However he's a gamer and as long as he's on the mound, he'll give the Phils a chance to win... but he's it. Their other "big" pitcher is Brett Myers who has NOT been very good at all this year. In fact, he seems to be having a simular problem that Oliver Perez is having, although Perez seems to be a little bit of a better big-game pitcher being able to beat the Phillies, Braves and Yankees. The bullpen HAS been good (Lidge looks reborn so far) but I don't know how long that will last with the derth of quailty starters.
The Braves scare me. Mostly if Smoltz can be healthy enough to be the close the rest of the year. If Soriano and Gonzoles come back healthy and can be what they were before their injuries then their bullpen looks very solid. Hudson has pitched like an ace and Jurgins he looked quite good. I DO think that Glavine's decent start will NOT continue in the 2nd half of the season, but I CAN see the Braves going out and getting another starter (Joe Blanton maybe?) and with the hitting the team has (Larry Jones, Texeria, Escobar, Francoeur, and McCann) they can score runs (although I expect a DL stint for Larry Jones any week now). However, if Smoltz CAN'T be healthy to close, and just ONE of Gonzo or Soriano cannot return to form, then my fears abide a little. We'll see.
With Pedro coming back today, and Alou back on Thursday, the Mets have two guys that can be BIG assets. If (and it is a big IF) these two guys can stay basically healthy the rest of the year (say only one more 15-day DL stint for each one) I think the Mets are ok and will win enough to make the playoffs. I would feel better if Delgado could have a second half of about .265 18 hr and 50 RBI, but I don't know if that's happening (prob not).
Even with that, the Mets have the tools to win the NL East (or at least the Wild card) and I think a playoff series starting three of Santana, Pedro and Maine is as good as just about ANYONE else.
They just have to GET there first.
The Mets are a weird team. It's hard to really define them so far this year... but despite all of their flaws (Delgado, Hielman, Perez, injuries, Willie, etc) they are only 3.5 games out of first and actually are looking pretty decent the last week.
There are a lot of things that look positive for them... Beltran starting to turn it on, the team's record in games started by Santana and Maine, the hitting and play of Reyes, Wright and Church, The continued success of Wagner, Sanchez and Shoenwiez... plus the fact that they had a stretch of 5-12 (with only the Yankee series being a good one) and are no more than 3.5 games out. Their run scored/runs given up diffiental is actually that of a much better team than their record shows and that is a good sign because it means that odds are thier record will adjust to those numbers and winning streaks are coming.
I think this team has under-achieved BIG time. I also think they have a big time hot streak in them.
I have my doubts about Willie Randolph. I think I prefer the (almost frienzied) antics of a Bobby V type manager. I'm NOT saying I want Booby V back. I liked him a lot, but I also reconize that he was always looking to put his stamp on a game and that bit the Mets at times. I'm NOT blaming the issues this year (and last) all on Willie.. but... I have my doubts about him.
I'm actually more concerned about the Braves than I am about the Phillies or Marlins. The Marlins are NOT for real. Sorry... but I do NOT believe it. Remember the Nationals' first year in Washington? Remember they were in 1st place going into the weekend of the All-Star break? Remember they finished FOURTH that year? That's the Marlins this year. The Phillies have an EXCELLENT offense... Utley is a total stud and Burrell looks very good this year so far. Howard and Rollins, while I do not think they will equal their massive numbers of last year, are at the tops of their positions hitting wise and with some decent personel surrounding them, I doubt the Phillies will have any major scoring droughts this year. However, their pitching is... well... it's bad. Simpley put... right now that really only have one guy in their starting five that is really a guy to worry about (Cole Hamels) and he's not only an injury risk.... he's also having a tad of an uneven stretch. However he's a gamer and as long as he's on the mound, he'll give the Phils a chance to win... but he's it. Their other "big" pitcher is Brett Myers who has NOT been very good at all this year. In fact, he seems to be having a simular problem that Oliver Perez is having, although Perez seems to be a little bit of a better big-game pitcher being able to beat the Phillies, Braves and Yankees. The bullpen HAS been good (Lidge looks reborn so far) but I don't know how long that will last with the derth of quailty starters.
The Braves scare me. Mostly if Smoltz can be healthy enough to be the close the rest of the year. If Soriano and Gonzoles come back healthy and can be what they were before their injuries then their bullpen looks very solid. Hudson has pitched like an ace and Jurgins he looked quite good. I DO think that Glavine's decent start will NOT continue in the 2nd half of the season, but I CAN see the Braves going out and getting another starter (Joe Blanton maybe?) and with the hitting the team has (Larry Jones, Texeria, Escobar, Francoeur, and McCann) they can score runs (although I expect a DL stint for Larry Jones any week now). However, if Smoltz CAN'T be healthy to close, and just ONE of Gonzo or Soriano cannot return to form, then my fears abide a little. We'll see.
With Pedro coming back today, and Alou back on Thursday, the Mets have two guys that can be BIG assets. If (and it is a big IF) these two guys can stay basically healthy the rest of the year (say only one more 15-day DL stint for each one) I think the Mets are ok and will win enough to make the playoffs. I would feel better if Delgado could have a second half of about .265 18 hr and 50 RBI, but I don't know if that's happening (prob not).
Even with that, the Mets have the tools to win the NL East (or at least the Wild card) and I think a playoff series starting three of Santana, Pedro and Maine is as good as just about ANYONE else.
They just have to GET there first.
Wednesday, May 14, 2008
WHAT I'M READING (COMICS)
So what are you lot reading these days?I'm still looking to cut down on my pull list... but I've been spending a lot of moolah on comis... despite not really being able to afford to do so. Thank God I don't smoke, drink or gamble (too much).
My pull list:
DC (every month)
Booster Gold
Justice League of America
JSA
The Flash
Teen Titans
Nightwing
Green Lantern
Blue Beetle
The New Atom
Checkmate
Batman and the Outsiders
Booster Gold, JSA and Green Lantern have been excellent. JLA and been hot and cold. The Flash and Nightwing have been very uneven. Blue Beetle has been very good, but the Atom is losing steam for me. Checkmate is good more often than it's not. Outsiders is a strange book.. I WANT to like it... and it's not bad... but the jury is still out on it.
DC (Event Books and Tie Ins)
Final Crisis and it's various tie ins
DC Universe #0
Yeah I plan on getting them all (for the most part). Hard to say how this will be. DC Universe was very good. reminded me of a set of trailers before movies. Very interesting. And the "return" of a particular character is kind of huge.
DC (on occasion, depending on the storyline or just started and I'm giving it a try)
Action Comics
Batman
The Titans
Rann/Thangar: Holy War
Supergirl
Brave and Bold
Death of the New Gods
The Whole Legion storyline in Action has been excellent. I've been picking up some of Morrision's Batman... but plan on getting the whole BATMAN: R.I.P. storyline. Issue #1 of The Titans was VERY uneven... I like the idea of the book, but it needs to be better for me to continue with it. I was surprised to find out in 52 that I seriously liked the dynamic with Adam Strange/Animal Man/Starfire so I wound up trying (and getting all issues of) Countdown to Adventure. I'm normally not into the space epic books, but I'm giving this one a shot and the first issue was pretty good. Supergirl is a book I WANT to buy. I LOVE the character.. however, DC STILL has no idea how to handle her. It's been VERY hit and miss with more misses than hits. Brave and Bold should be a book I'm buying. the art is great and the story is fairly fun... but it just hasn't been grabbing me enough to keep buying it. Death of the New Gods... was ... well... HORRIBLE. Gave up on it fairly early. LOUSY concept. LOUSY execution (no pun intended). LOUSY everything. Big Barda and Scott Free deserved better than this.
DC (Mini-Series I WAS buying until they ended)
Countdown
Suicide Squad
Salvation Run
Countdown to Adventure
Black Adam: The Dark Age
Countdown was, for the most part, not that great. Very uneven... spirialed into too many directions like it didn't know what it wanted to be. It had some excellent issues (especially the two issue "Great Disaster from Buddy Blank's point of view" arc) but was more miss than hit. It WANTED to be 52... but was not. Suicide Squad was pretty decent... not great... but an enjoyable read. Salvation Run was a disapointment, but wasn't too bad either. I expected a little more from it. Countdown to Advanture was a huge surpirse. I didn't think I would like it as much as I did, although the Forerunner backup story just left me cold. Black Adam was EXCELLENT. I hear it may become an ongoing. If it does I am there.
Marvel (Every Month)
Ultimate Spider-Man
Amazing Spider-Man
Thunderbolts
Iron Fist
New Avengers
Mighty Avengers
Capt America
The Hulk
The Twelve
Dark Tower: The Long Road Home
Ultimate Spider-Man, Iron Fist and The Twelve are solid as they come. Capt America has been very good also. I'm enjoying the two Avengers books for the most part. I'm reading the Hulk until the reveal just who he is (I have my suspicions) and most likely will drop it after that. Thunderbolts has been hit and miss lately. Spider-Man... well... I don;t know how to classify it. It hasn't been HORRIBLE... but the last two storylines were pretty weak... and I'm still having an issue with the whole "One More Day" thing. I have NEVER stopped buying Spider-Man in the last 30 years as long as I was buying comics overall... I'm not ready to stop yet... but it MUST get better. Teh Dark Tower has been decnet... but as a huge fan of the books this particular storyline seems... well... wrong to me.
Marvel (Event Books and Tie ins)
Secret Invasion
Spider-Man: Secret Invasion
I loved the idea behind this event.. but the 2nd issue was not overly good. I hope it picks up. I plan to avoid a majority of the tie ins here. Frontline is just a rehash (in my opinion) of the actual event itself with Ben Urich thrown in running around in danger. I'll pass.
Marvel (on occasion, depending on the storyline, just started and I'm giving it a try, or once tried it and I'm done)
Avengers: The Inititive
The Last Defenders
Marvel: 1985
Astonishing X-Men
Exiles
Kick-Ass
The Inititive has been ok... not bad... not great. But I think I'm done with it. Same with Last Defenders. I'm giving 1985 a shot... but a short leash. Astonishing was very good at one point but the current world breaker plot has toiled WAY too long. I'm done at the end of this arc. As for Exiles... I bought this book for years. I LOVED the concept. However..it's so conviluted and soap operaish now it's a shell of it's former self... plus the fact that almost every new character in the book is boring as hell. The fun has seeped out of this title. I gave up on it a while ago. Kick Ass has been decent so far... but not world breaking like Miller wants everone to think.
Image (Every Month)
Invincible
Walking Dead
Two great books (both by Kirkman). Invincible is just about the best book out in comics today.
Dynamite (Every Month)
The Boys
I can't help it. This book is too wild not to enjoy. Crazy stuff.
Overall the BEST books out there right now are Booster Gold, Ultimate Spider-Man and Invincible.
How about you?
So what are you lot reading these days?I'm still looking to cut down on my pull list... but I've been spending a lot of moolah on comis... despite not really being able to afford to do so. Thank God I don't smoke, drink or gamble (too much).
My pull list:
DC (every month)
Booster Gold
Justice League of America
JSA
The Flash
Teen Titans
Nightwing
Green Lantern
Blue Beetle
The New Atom
Checkmate
Batman and the Outsiders
Booster Gold, JSA and Green Lantern have been excellent. JLA and been hot and cold. The Flash and Nightwing have been very uneven. Blue Beetle has been very good, but the Atom is losing steam for me. Checkmate is good more often than it's not. Outsiders is a strange book.. I WANT to like it... and it's not bad... but the jury is still out on it.
DC (Event Books and Tie Ins)
Final Crisis and it's various tie ins
DC Universe #0
Yeah I plan on getting them all (for the most part). Hard to say how this will be. DC Universe was very good. reminded me of a set of trailers before movies. Very interesting. And the "return" of a particular character is kind of huge.
DC (on occasion, depending on the storyline or just started and I'm giving it a try)
Action Comics
Batman
The Titans
Rann/Thangar: Holy War
Supergirl
Brave and Bold
Death of the New Gods
The Whole Legion storyline in Action has been excellent. I've been picking up some of Morrision's Batman... but plan on getting the whole BATMAN: R.I.P. storyline. Issue #1 of The Titans was VERY uneven... I like the idea of the book, but it needs to be better for me to continue with it. I was surprised to find out in 52 that I seriously liked the dynamic with Adam Strange/Animal Man/Starfire so I wound up trying (and getting all issues of) Countdown to Adventure. I'm normally not into the space epic books, but I'm giving this one a shot and the first issue was pretty good. Supergirl is a book I WANT to buy. I LOVE the character.. however, DC STILL has no idea how to handle her. It's been VERY hit and miss with more misses than hits. Brave and Bold should be a book I'm buying. the art is great and the story is fairly fun... but it just hasn't been grabbing me enough to keep buying it. Death of the New Gods... was ... well... HORRIBLE. Gave up on it fairly early. LOUSY concept. LOUSY execution (no pun intended). LOUSY everything. Big Barda and Scott Free deserved better than this.
DC (Mini-Series I WAS buying until they ended)
Countdown
Suicide Squad
Salvation Run
Countdown to Adventure
Black Adam: The Dark Age
Countdown was, for the most part, not that great. Very uneven... spirialed into too many directions like it didn't know what it wanted to be. It had some excellent issues (especially the two issue "Great Disaster from Buddy Blank's point of view" arc) but was more miss than hit. It WANTED to be 52... but was not. Suicide Squad was pretty decent... not great... but an enjoyable read. Salvation Run was a disapointment, but wasn't too bad either. I expected a little more from it. Countdown to Advanture was a huge surpirse. I didn't think I would like it as much as I did, although the Forerunner backup story just left me cold. Black Adam was EXCELLENT. I hear it may become an ongoing. If it does I am there.
Marvel (Every Month)
Ultimate Spider-Man
Amazing Spider-Man
Thunderbolts
Iron Fist
New Avengers
Mighty Avengers
Capt America
The Hulk
The Twelve
Dark Tower: The Long Road Home
Ultimate Spider-Man, Iron Fist and The Twelve are solid as they come. Capt America has been very good also. I'm enjoying the two Avengers books for the most part. I'm reading the Hulk until the reveal just who he is (I have my suspicions) and most likely will drop it after that. Thunderbolts has been hit and miss lately. Spider-Man... well... I don;t know how to classify it. It hasn't been HORRIBLE... but the last two storylines were pretty weak... and I'm still having an issue with the whole "One More Day" thing. I have NEVER stopped buying Spider-Man in the last 30 years as long as I was buying comics overall... I'm not ready to stop yet... but it MUST get better. Teh Dark Tower has been decnet... but as a huge fan of the books this particular storyline seems... well... wrong to me.
Marvel (Event Books and Tie ins)
Secret Invasion
Spider-Man: Secret Invasion
I loved the idea behind this event.. but the 2nd issue was not overly good. I hope it picks up. I plan to avoid a majority of the tie ins here. Frontline is just a rehash (in my opinion) of the actual event itself with Ben Urich thrown in running around in danger. I'll pass.
Marvel (on occasion, depending on the storyline, just started and I'm giving it a try, or once tried it and I'm done)
Avengers: The Inititive
The Last Defenders
Marvel: 1985
Astonishing X-Men
Exiles
Kick-Ass
The Inititive has been ok... not bad... not great. But I think I'm done with it. Same with Last Defenders. I'm giving 1985 a shot... but a short leash. Astonishing was very good at one point but the current world breaker plot has toiled WAY too long. I'm done at the end of this arc. As for Exiles... I bought this book for years. I LOVED the concept. However..it's so conviluted and soap operaish now it's a shell of it's former self... plus the fact that almost every new character in the book is boring as hell. The fun has seeped out of this title. I gave up on it a while ago. Kick Ass has been decent so far... but not world breaking like Miller wants everone to think.
Image (Every Month)
Invincible
Walking Dead
Two great books (both by Kirkman). Invincible is just about the best book out in comics today.
Dynamite (Every Month)
The Boys
I can't help it. This book is too wild not to enjoy. Crazy stuff.
Overall the BEST books out there right now are Booster Gold, Ultimate Spider-Man and Invincible.
How about you?
Wednesday, April 09, 2008
BAD JOB
I'm a big proponent of a baseball team being responsable for a game. When a Major League team loses, it's mostly (if not all) on the shoulders of the guys on the field. For example... Carlos Delgado's bad throw that hit Chase Utley in the back and allowed two runs to score, not to mention Jose Reyes lining up the throw in direct line with the runner instead of moving further out.
However, there are times I feel that a manager puts his stamp on a game in a way that just basically puts his team in the position to lose.
Yesterday was one of those days.
Willie Randolph made two major mistakes yesterday... and I honestly feel that in the end, the Mets lost the game as a result.
1 - He took Perez out too early. I know Perez had thrown 94 pitches and he was a little shakey walking two in the 6th... but come on... the guy has been dominate all season so far and he needs to be able to work through his "off" innings. He should have been still in there to finish the 6th and maybe even start the 7th. His ceiling should NOT be 95 pitches. He should be able to go at 110/112 at his age.
2 - In the bottom of the 7th, down 3-2, Brian Schnieder leads off with a single. Pinch hitting for Schoenwise, Edny Chavez came up. Now Endy is the best bunter on the team. In fact, I'll go as far to say he just about the best bunter in the NL. The Mets are down a run. The NEEDED to score a run there. So what does Willie have him do? Swing away. The result? A double play. Then on the NEXT PITCH Jose Reyes hits a single... which would have scored the tying run had Chavez bunted the runner over. At home, in the late innings... you ALWAYS play for the tie.
So... while the team spit the bit and lost... the manager's decisions were a direct influence on the final score. Bad job Willie.
I'm a big proponent of a baseball team being responsable for a game. When a Major League team loses, it's mostly (if not all) on the shoulders of the guys on the field. For example... Carlos Delgado's bad throw that hit Chase Utley in the back and allowed two runs to score, not to mention Jose Reyes lining up the throw in direct line with the runner instead of moving further out.
However, there are times I feel that a manager puts his stamp on a game in a way that just basically puts his team in the position to lose.
Yesterday was one of those days.
Willie Randolph made two major mistakes yesterday... and I honestly feel that in the end, the Mets lost the game as a result.
1 - He took Perez out too early. I know Perez had thrown 94 pitches and he was a little shakey walking two in the 6th... but come on... the guy has been dominate all season so far and he needs to be able to work through his "off" innings. He should have been still in there to finish the 6th and maybe even start the 7th. His ceiling should NOT be 95 pitches. He should be able to go at 110/112 at his age.
2 - In the bottom of the 7th, down 3-2, Brian Schnieder leads off with a single. Pinch hitting for Schoenwise, Edny Chavez came up. Now Endy is the best bunter on the team. In fact, I'll go as far to say he just about the best bunter in the NL. The Mets are down a run. The NEEDED to score a run there. So what does Willie have him do? Swing away. The result? A double play. Then on the NEXT PITCH Jose Reyes hits a single... which would have scored the tying run had Chavez bunted the runner over. At home, in the late innings... you ALWAYS play for the tie.
So... while the team spit the bit and lost... the manager's decisions were a direct influence on the final score. Bad job Willie.
Tuesday, April 01, 2008
WELL... CRAP.
Not exactly what I (or many Mets fans) was expecting.
Rough start for Pedro and now... after leaving with a hamsting injury in the 4th... we might not have him from anywhere from two to four weeks.
Ouch.
Kind of a sloppy game hitting wise... Mets really let the Marlins off the hook a few times.
Delgado isn't looking too good at the plate.
Some nice at bats for Pegota and Schineder. church needs to tone it down a little... be more patient.
Not a terrible loss... but a game they should have won.
Here's hoping Pedro isn't TOO bad off... and that they come back and win tomorrow.
Not exactly what I (or many Mets fans) was expecting.
Rough start for Pedro and now... after leaving with a hamsting injury in the 4th... we might not have him from anywhere from two to four weeks.
Ouch.
Kind of a sloppy game hitting wise... Mets really let the Marlins off the hook a few times.
Delgado isn't looking too good at the plate.
Some nice at bats for Pegota and Schineder. church needs to tone it down a little... be more patient.
Not a terrible loss... but a game they should have won.
Here's hoping Pedro isn't TOO bad off... and that they come back and win tomorrow.
Monday, March 31, 2008
AND SO IT BEGINS...
The Mets win today... besting the Marlins 7-2. Johan Santana looked great. Davod Wright blew the game open with a two out, bases loaded double. The Bullpen looked good. The Phillies lost. The Braves lost last night.
All is well with the universe.
Very nice game. The umpiring actually cost Santana a perfect game with calling two start balls on what should have been called three strikes to Hanley Ramirez... the umpire wasn't overly good. Also Reyes was WAY safe on his stolen base attempt. Ah well... either way the game was tight and the team looked good.
I was glad to see some VERY good at bats from Ryan Church... especially with Lastings Milledge hitting a home run and scoring the go-ahead run i the 9th for Washington today (Nats are in first place by the way with a 2-0 record!). Church hit the ball hard.. had an RBI single and was robbed of another one later in the game by a great play by Ramirez.
I liked the hustle and head's up defense that Schneider showed today. His bat is going to be a rough one to swallow at times (I'd be ESTATIC if he hit .265, but .240 is more likely) but his defense is going to be a huge plus. I'll feel better when Castro is off the DL to provide occasion pop and some solid hitting from the catcher position though.
The only one that really concerned me was Delgado. I couldn't really tell if he looked decent at the plate or not... was hard to tell. I'm hoping he gets things in line though.
I would have left Sosa in to pitch the ninth, but it looks like Willy is trying to establish definite roles for the bullpen. I guess I shouldn't be second guessing his moves one game into the season.
So Pedro goes tommorrow! Looking forward to seeing him. I expect good things from Pedro this year. I don't see why 27-29 starts should be out of the question. I expect him to hit a lull at some point where he might need extra rest... but overall I have a good feeling about his health and his role this year.
My predictions for the Mets and everyone else should be posted tonight or tommorrow. Look for it!
So the 2008 Major League Baseball season has begun and so far things are rosey.
The Mets win today... besting the Marlins 7-2. Johan Santana looked great. Davod Wright blew the game open with a two out, bases loaded double. The Bullpen looked good. The Phillies lost. The Braves lost last night.
All is well with the universe.
Very nice game. The umpiring actually cost Santana a perfect game with calling two start balls on what should have been called three strikes to Hanley Ramirez... the umpire wasn't overly good. Also Reyes was WAY safe on his stolen base attempt. Ah well... either way the game was tight and the team looked good.
I was glad to see some VERY good at bats from Ryan Church... especially with Lastings Milledge hitting a home run and scoring the go-ahead run i the 9th for Washington today (Nats are in first place by the way with a 2-0 record!). Church hit the ball hard.. had an RBI single and was robbed of another one later in the game by a great play by Ramirez.
I liked the hustle and head's up defense that Schneider showed today. His bat is going to be a rough one to swallow at times (I'd be ESTATIC if he hit .265, but .240 is more likely) but his defense is going to be a huge plus. I'll feel better when Castro is off the DL to provide occasion pop and some solid hitting from the catcher position though.
The only one that really concerned me was Delgado. I couldn't really tell if he looked decent at the plate or not... was hard to tell. I'm hoping he gets things in line though.I would have left Sosa in to pitch the ninth, but it looks like Willy is trying to establish definite roles for the bullpen. I guess I shouldn't be second guessing his moves one game into the season.
So Pedro goes tommorrow! Looking forward to seeing him. I expect good things from Pedro this year. I don't see why 27-29 starts should be out of the question. I expect him to hit a lull at some point where he might need extra rest... but overall I have a good feeling about his health and his role this year.
My predictions for the Mets and everyone else should be posted tonight or tommorrow. Look for it!
Wednesday, March 26, 2008
DID YOU KNOW?: KISS- THE ELDER
Following the footsteps of other bloggers, I've decided to try to introduce a few ongoing features here at Rocket Ramblings. The first of these is going to be "DID YOU KNOW?"
DID YOU KNOW? is going to be little tib-bits in Pop Culture that you may never have heard about.
DID YOU KNOW? is going to be little tib-bits in Pop Culture that you may never have heard about.
So, I'm sure everyone has heard of KISS.
If you haven't... well... move on. You won't care about this.
If you haven't... well... move on. You won't care about this.
The rest of you... I'm sure you know all about KISS' original days in make-up and their hard rock roots.
And you most likely know they delved into an attempt at some more exposure (and money) with a "disco" track (I Was Made For Loving You) on their 1979 album 'Dynasty'.
And you most likely know they delved into an attempt at some more exposure (and money) with a "disco" track (I Was Made For Loving You) on their 1979 album 'Dynasty'.
What you may NOT know, is that in 1981, the band released a concept album looking to expand their fan base and raise the sagging sales from their 1980 Album 'Unmasked'.
KISS was going through some transition in 1981. Their original drummer, Peter Criss, was no longer in the group, having been either booted out or had left on his own accord (depending on who is telling the story) due to some serious substance abuse problems (Criss had barely played on 1979's 'Dynasty' and not at all on 1980's 'Unmasked'). While the group was doing well overseas, their popularity in America was waining. Sales on 'Unmasked' were low and the tour didn't do as well as past tours. While the band debated internally about returning to a more heavier sound like their original albums (ie: Dressed to Kill) ... it was decided that a broader, and more artsist statement was needed to refresh the KISS ARMY (the name for the bands rabid fans) and lure in some new fans. Despite a loud protest by lead guitarist Ace Frehley, who hated the notion, Paul Stanley and Gene Simmons (along with creative manager Bill Aucion) went ahead with a plan for a concept album in the vein of Pink Floyd's 'THE WALL'.
KISS was going through some transition in 1981. Their original drummer, Peter Criss, was no longer in the group, having been either booted out or had left on his own accord (depending on who is telling the story) due to some serious substance abuse problems (Criss had barely played on 1979's 'Dynasty' and not at all on 1980's 'Unmasked'). While the group was doing well overseas, their popularity in America was waining. Sales on 'Unmasked' were low and the tour didn't do as well as past tours. While the band debated internally about returning to a more heavier sound like their original albums (ie: Dressed to Kill) ... it was decided that a broader, and more artsist statement was needed to refresh the KISS ARMY (the name for the bands rabid fans) and lure in some new fans. Despite a loud protest by lead guitarist Ace Frehley, who hated the notion, Paul Stanley and Gene Simmons (along with creative manager Bill Aucion) went ahead with a plan for a concept album in the vein of Pink Floyd's 'THE WALL'.
Having worked with Bob Ezrin (co-producer of 'THE WALL') before, the Band went into the studio with him... looking to create something that would renew America's interest in KISS.
What came from those sessions was 'MUSIC FROM THE ELDER'.
MUSIC FROM THE ELDER was a concept album that wrapped songs around a storyline that tells of a young boy who is recruited and trained by The Council of Elders (of the Order of the Rose), a mysterious group who is dedicated to combating evil in all forms. The Boy is trained and cared for by an elderly caretaker who goes by the name of Morpheus (sounds a little like the Matrix now that I think of it). The album's lyrics describe the journey, training, and mindset of the Boy as he travels and eventually arrives at the temple of the Elders, undergoings his training and prepares for whatever quest he'll be placed into.
MUSIC FROM THE ELDER was a concept album that wrapped songs around a storyline that tells of a young boy who is recruited and trained by The Council of Elders (of the Order of the Rose), a mysterious group who is dedicated to combating evil in all forms. The Boy is trained and cared for by an elderly caretaker who goes by the name of Morpheus (sounds a little like the Matrix now that I think of it). The album's lyrics describe the journey, training, and mindset of the Boy as he travels and eventually arrives at the temple of the Elders, undergoings his training and prepares for whatever quest he'll be placed into.
When KISS played 'THE ELDER' for their management and record company, the reaction was fairly negative. No one could understand why the band would take such a dramatic step away from their normal sound and musical direction. Business manager Howard Marks refused to allow his company's name to even appear in the liner notes of the album. If KISS thought the record company's reaction was bad, they were totaly unprepared for their fan's reaction. They seemed to hate it. The backlash was loud and harsh. The ironic thing was that the music critics, who had been KILLING KISS for years, loved it. KISS got more positive reviews from the likes of Rolling Stone and other magazines/critics than they ever had before. However, the good reviews of the critics weren't enough. The album made only a brief appearance on the charts. After being released in November 1981, it peaked at #75 and was off the charts completely by February 1982.
The planned tour for the album went south too. The negitive reaction was so strong that plans for the tour were completely scrapped. The only real promotion for the album at all was an appearance on the tv show "Fridays" where they played three of the songs and one appearance at Studio 54 that Frehley refused to even participate in.
Frehley, who had disagreed with the concept in the first place, left the group over THE ELDER.
Rumors have flown for years stating that the original plan was that THE ELDER was actually to be a movie and that the album was only what it said it was: the music for the film. Whether or not this is true I really don't know. The album was also supposed to have dialouge (lines from the film's script?) weaved throughout the songs, but none of it made it to the final product. Only one song (the song "I") had any spoken words at all (at the end of the song, Morphus proclaims to the Elders that The Boy is ready for his mission).
Now for the ironic part. The die-hard KISS fans who lambasted the album and refused to buy it, killing the sales and the tour?
Well, they freaking LOVE it now.
Ask any hard KISS ARMY fanatic what his three favorite KISS albums are... and odds are, one of them will be THE ELDER.
The legend of the album grew and spread over the years following the 1981 release. At one point it was difficult to get a copy. Rumors about a film popped up as early as 1982 and lasted as long as the early 90s. The idea that there was a story behind the music eventually drew in fans of concept albums and Sword and Sorcery fans who were not normally familar with KISS' music.
I, myself, was introduced to THE ELDER by a friend in High School, Chris Sauer. Chris was (and still is) a HUGE KISS fanatic. He played the album for me back in 1986... and I loved it. It was dark and moody and very, very compelling. Like a lot of others, I was facinated by the idea that there was this huge saga-like storyline behind the music that had yet to see daylight.
Today, THE ELDER is fondly revered by KISS fans and requests for an "Elder-centric" tour have been constantly voiced over the last ten years. Despite the fact it caused a rift between the band (one that lasted for years) and was even denouced by all involved (Stanley, Simmons and Ezrin all admitted that idea was a HUGE mistake and all went on to blast the album years later) THE ELDER is a facinating page in the history on a group not known for their high concepts at the time.
Recommended tracks: Odyssey, The Oath, and A World without Heroes.
Tuesday, March 11, 2008
ROCKETING TO HEAVEN
Fuck.
Yeah, I said fuck.
Today I found out (on comicbookresources.com) that Rocketeer creator/artist/writer Dave Stevens passed away after a long battle with Luekemia. Dave was 53.
Obviously, I was a HUGE Dave Stevens fan. The Rocketeer is not only a great comic and fun movie for me. It's a part of my identity... something that I identified with strongly. There are an entre mess of people who know me as "Rocky" or "Rocket". It's been my nickname (and my email address) for over fifteen years.
Dave Stevens is actually more known for his modern renditions of Betty Page then he is The Rocketeer. It was due to Dave's love of Betty and amazing artwork of her (and her use in the pages of the Rocketeer as Cliff Secord's girlfriend) that brought Betty out of seclusion and back into the public eye.
Dave's unreal talent was unmistakenable. His comic book covers and lithograhps are the stuff of dreams. His ttention to detail and the beauty he brought out in his artwork is instantly reconizable.
I got the chance to meet Dave at the 1998 DragonCon in Atlanta. Dave was there doing signings but NOT doing sketches. After talking with him for a while, Dave pulled me aside and told me (hushed) that if I left one of the white boards I was using for sketches with him, he might have a present for me by the end of the con... but it had to be a secret, because he did NOT want to get into doing a mound of sketches.
The next day, I was walking in Artists Alley when I felt a tap on my shoulder. It was Dave. He motioned with his head for me to follow him. We went to his table and he handed me a brown paper bag.
"Our secret right?" he said.
"Absoultely." I responded. "What do I o-"
"Get the hell out of here, you don't owe me anything." he cut me off. "The least I can do for a guy walking around with a name tag that says 'RocketeerZ' huh?"
I chatted with Dave a little more and even got to sit behind the table with him for a few minutes. The friends I was with at the Con have teased me ever since that dave must have needed to take out a restraining order on me to get me away from there.
The sketch he did was a simple Rocketeer helmet. He had personalized it for me and signed it. I freaking love it.
It most likely only took him a couple of minutes... but the fact he took the time to do it meant the world to me.
I've heard a lot of things about Dave over the years, (especially from his ex-wife horror scream queen Brooke Stevens) but I will always rememeber him as a great and personable guy who created something that touched me and a guy that gave me the single greatest comic-book related item I own.
Rest In Peace Dave. The world is a little darker without you.
Fuck.
Yeah, I said fuck.
Today I found out (on comicbookresources.com) that Rocketeer creator/artist/writer Dave Stevens passed away after a long battle with Luekemia. Dave was 53.
Obviously, I was a HUGE Dave Stevens fan. The Rocketeer is not only a great comic and fun movie for me. It's a part of my identity... something that I identified with strongly. There are an entre mess of people who know me as "Rocky" or "Rocket". It's been my nickname (and my email address) for over fifteen years.
Dave Stevens is actually more known for his modern renditions of Betty Page then he is The Rocketeer. It was due to Dave's love of Betty and amazing artwork of her (and her use in the pages of the Rocketeer as Cliff Secord's girlfriend) that brought Betty out of seclusion and back into the public eye.
Dave's unreal talent was unmistakenable. His comic book covers and lithograhps are the stuff of dreams. His ttention to detail and the beauty he brought out in his artwork is instantly reconizable.
I got the chance to meet Dave at the 1998 DragonCon in Atlanta. Dave was there doing signings but NOT doing sketches. After talking with him for a while, Dave pulled me aside and told me (hushed) that if I left one of the white boards I was using for sketches with him, he might have a present for me by the end of the con... but it had to be a secret, because he did NOT want to get into doing a mound of sketches.
The next day, I was walking in Artists Alley when I felt a tap on my shoulder. It was Dave. He motioned with his head for me to follow him. We went to his table and he handed me a brown paper bag.
"Our secret right?" he said.
"Absoultely." I responded. "What do I o-"
"Get the hell out of here, you don't owe me anything." he cut me off. "The least I can do for a guy walking around with a name tag that says 'RocketeerZ' huh?"
I chatted with Dave a little more and even got to sit behind the table with him for a few minutes. The friends I was with at the Con have teased me ever since that dave must have needed to take out a restraining order on me to get me away from there.
The sketch he did was a simple Rocketeer helmet. He had personalized it for me and signed it. I freaking love it.
It most likely only took him a couple of minutes... but the fact he took the time to do it meant the world to me.
I've heard a lot of things about Dave over the years, (especially from his ex-wife horror scream queen Brooke Stevens) but I will always rememeber him as a great and personable guy who created something that touched me and a guy that gave me the single greatest comic-book related item I own.
Rest In Peace Dave. The world is a little darker without you.
Wednesday, March 05, 2008
THE RACE TO THE WHITE HOUSE
Well, I've made it no secret over the last eight years that I am a huge supporter of John McCain. I wanted him to win the nomination back in 2000 and was highly disappointed that he did not.
I'm not looking to go into a long post of why I support McCain (although I plan on doing so soon). I just wanted to express my contentment that he won the Republican nomination. For the first time in a long time I'm comfortable with the Republican nominee.
I know his age is a factor to consider, but I really think McCain is the man for this job. I'll list why soon.
Conratulations to him for his victory. Already I have much better feelings about the future of this country.
I hope those positive feelings remain.
As for Obama and Clintoover the democratic way... I have to wonder if many democrats were hoping for an Obama sweep... if only to allow the dems to focus on the fight against McCain instead of at each other. Clinton's strong showing in Ohio was huge though... it showed that the dems aren't quite ready to name Obama their top dog... and if memory serves me right... no candidate has ever won the election who didn't also win Ohio.
Let the games begin.
Well, I've made it no secret over the last eight years that I am a huge supporter of John McCain. I wanted him to win the nomination back in 2000 and was highly disappointed that he did not.
I'm not looking to go into a long post of why I support McCain (although I plan on doing so soon). I just wanted to express my contentment that he won the Republican nomination. For the first time in a long time I'm comfortable with the Republican nominee.
I know his age is a factor to consider, but I really think McCain is the man for this job. I'll list why soon.
Conratulations to him for his victory. Already I have much better feelings about the future of this country.
I hope those positive feelings remain.
As for Obama and Clintoover the democratic way... I have to wonder if many democrats were hoping for an Obama sweep... if only to allow the dems to focus on the fight against McCain instead of at each other. Clinton's strong showing in Ohio was huge though... it showed that the dems aren't quite ready to name Obama their top dog... and if memory serves me right... no candidate has ever won the election who didn't also win Ohio.
Let the games begin.
Saturday, March 01, 2008
FIGHTING THE INJURY BUG
First, Carlos Delgado goes back to New York for an MRI on his hip.
Then Ryan Church and Marlon Anderson collide in the field and both need to be helped off.
Looks like Church has a concussion and will be out about two weeks.
That's just... great. Four games into the preseason and the walking wounded are already piling up.
I hope everyone is ok. We cannot afford long term injuries here.
I wonder if the Nationals would consider trading (oft-injured) Nick Johnson since Dimetri Young was given a multi-year contract to play first base last year? How about Nomar from the Dodgers, seeing that he's not assured a starting job at all? We could use some serious help here if Delgado is on the shelf for more than like a week or two.
First, Carlos Delgado goes back to New York for an MRI on his hip.
Then Ryan Church and Marlon Anderson collide in the field and both need to be helped off.
Looks like Church has a concussion and will be out about two weeks.
That's just... great. Four games into the preseason and the walking wounded are already piling up.
I hope everyone is ok. We cannot afford long term injuries here.
I wonder if the Nationals would consider trading (oft-injured) Nick Johnson since Dimetri Young was given a multi-year contract to play first base last year? How about Nomar from the Dodgers, seeing that he's not assured a starting job at all? We could use some serious help here if Delgado is on the shelf for more than like a week or two.
Wednesday, February 20, 2008
TOP TEN GREATEST DRUMMERS
Ok, thanks to my friend Lisa and her post about the latest Van Halen concert she went to and a list of her Top Ten Guitarists, a conversation/debate on said list of guitarists caused Lisa to ask me "and when will I see your top ten Drummers list?"
That sounded like a hell of an idea for a post, so Lisa... here it is. (Oh, and by the way... Lisa's blog can be found at: http://lisamaconfamily.blogspot.com/. Check it out.)
Now... the main thing I had to think about was this: Do I stick to ROCK drummers or try and go out and out for drummers PERIOD?
This was hard. Lisa's guitarist list was limited to guitar players that SHE has personally heard (which is why B.B. King was on MY list, but not HERS, since she had never really listened to King play).
That made sense, so I'm going to follow the same critera, although I will add one other faction: how much of am influence on me a particular drummer had (being that I've been a drummer for the last thirty-two years). If you disagree with my choices and feel I left someone out, it COULD BE because a drummer you'd put on the list is someone I haven't really heard a lot.
I'm thirty-seven and started playing the drums back when I was five. No, I wasn't just mindlessly banging sticks over my head or what-not. I honestly can say I played the drums back when I was five. True Story: My Dad was a one-hit wonder back in the 60s with a band called THE SAND PEPPLES (not to be confused with the R & B trio with the same name). Don't ask me what the song was, I have no idea. It didn't go very high on the top 100 and got them just enough fame to get regular gigs in Manhattan and New Jersey night clubs in the late 60s/very-early 70s. In any case, my father had a drum set set up in our attic along with his trumpet, trombone and other music stuff. My sister and I were constantly told "DO NOT TOUCH MY INSTRUMENTS." The attic was OFF LIMITS and WOE to those of use who disobayed.
The following is a story my father used to delight in telling. I, myself, have VERY LITTLE MEMORY of it. Anyway, at five years old, I was constantly dying to get my hands on that drum set and bang around. One particular spring day, my father was out washing the car in the drive way. For one reason or another, I thought it was the perfect oppertunity to get into the attic and play the drums. You see, at five years old I just did not grasp the concept that SOUND TRAVELS. Dad was outside, and I (and the drum set) was inside, THUS he wouldn't know. Right? Wrong.
So I crept up the stairs, pushed open the door. Sat at the drum set, picked up the sticks and started gleefully banging away.
It didn't take very long for my father to realize someone was inside and touching his precious musical instruments. He threw down the hose and stormed inside. My older sister Anne-Marie, who was most likely heading for the front door to rat me out and score some points with the old man, was standing in the kitchen. That meant my father knew it was me upstairs in direct violation of NESTOR HOUSE RULE #1 ("Thou shalt not touch thine musical instruments upon pain of death and spankings galore").
My father rushed up the stairs, most likely flexing his hands in preperation of a master spanking when halfway up he realized something.
I was keeping a perfect 4/4 time.
He stopped at the top of the stairs (I had no idea he was there because, in accordance of my blantant misunderstanding of the rules of sound, I couldn't hear his stair pounding above the banging of the drums). He stood there and listened. I kept keeping perfect time. I tossed in drum rolls and cymbal crashes and other fills... yet my timing didn't falter.
My father suddenly realized. I had learned to play just by watching him. He had a 5-year old drum-prodigy on his hands.
He slowly opened the door. Who knows how long it took me to relaize he was there. I stopped and froze. I was nailed and my five year old mind was most likely racing to come up with a possible way to blame the entire thing on my sister.
"From now on..." my father said to me. "You are allowed to come up here and play as often as you like." He then closed the door and went back downstairs.
That Christmas, I got my very own Drum Set. I've been playing ever since pretty much.
ANYWAY, I thought my background was important so you can see I have a vested part in this list.
SO... without futher adeu...
1. STEWART COPELAND: Yeah.. like ANYONE is surprised by this. There's a few reasons why I LOVE THE POLICE so much... and Stewart is a huge one. He's crisp, clean and on the money every time. His focusing on cymbal/hi-hat/bass drum style is without a doubt the smoothest I've ever heard (with the number two drummer on my list being the only one to come close). His reggae, jazz, funk, rock and african styles all combine into an unmistakenable sound. He also has a"snap" style (rimshotting focus) that I love. People who I've never met and hear me play have said to me "Your style reminds me of Stewart Copeland." They're right. He's the largest influence on my style as a drummer. There's a reason Stewart is known as "the Rythymist". He's the BEST. EVER.
2. BILL BRUFORD: Bill was the original drummer for YES. Bill combines Jazz technique with rudimentary rock. His ability to take simple parts and rudiments and put them all together into complex pieces is amazing. Bill once said that he "never acquired a drum technique for the sake of acquiring it, but as a solution to a particular problem." and that if he ever heard something that he couldn't do, he would learn how to do it. Anyone questioning how high on this list he should be needs to sit and listen to the Yes album FRAGILE. Amazing stuff.
3. BUDDY RICH: Buddy is has often been called "The World's Greatest Drummer". His talent for rhythm was first noticed by his father (hey! Like me!), who realized thatBuddy was able to keep a steady beat with spoons as a toddler. He began playing drums in vaudeville when he was around two years old as "Traps the Drum Wonder". By the time Buddy was eleven years old he was performing as a bandleader. Buddy supposedly never had a single drum lesson, andhe claimed that any actual drum instruction "would only degrade his musical talent." He also never admitted to practicing, claiming to play the drums only during his live performances. In any case, Buddy was unreal. His speed and ability to do numberous complex rudiments AT THE SAME TIME was unheard of. You name the style... he mastered it.
4. TONY THOMPSON: First off, let's all bow our heads for a drummer that we lost WAY too early, since Tony passed away in 2003 of Kidney Cancer. Tony was in a number of bands (including R&B/dance/disco band CHIC) and did a BUSLOAD of session work on albums by the likes of Madonna (on her 1984 album "Like A Virgin"), Rod Stewart, Robert Palmer, Mick Jagger, and David Bowie (on the "Let's Dance" album and Tony toured with David through-out the "Serious Moonlight Tour" for Let's Dance). Tony was BEST known, however, as the drummer for POWER STATION who had some big hits in 1985 with "Get It On (Bang a Gong)" and "Some Like It Hot". Tony played in a style that combined Fuse, Funk and Rock. His heavy off-tempo tom-tom/snare/bass drum fills were fantastic.
5. NEIL PERT: Neil's work for RUSH is the stuff of legend. He's often been number one on many lists of the greatest drummers and that's fair since the guy is flat out incredible. His style is that of Hard Rock, meshed with Big Band and Jazz. His long and exteme live drum solos at RUSH shows in the mid 80s were stuff that set many a a young fan insane. Over the years, Neil has received a TON of awards for his performances and is highly regarded for his technical proficiency and stamina. Little fun bit of trivia: Neil actually writes most of the lyrics for RUSH's songs. Betcha didn't know that!
6. GINGER BAKER: Ok, here's the part where many of you say "Who?" but Ginger was a pioneer who was probablly the first drummer to use a double bass drum set up instead of a single kick. Ginger played with many groups but is best known as the drummer for CREAM and BLIND FAITH and is one of the greatest fusion drummers ever. He's known for using a variety of other percussion instruments and for his application of African rhythms to much of his drumming. Ginger also HATES being called a 'rock drummer." He prefers to be known as a Jazz drummer.
7. CARL PALMER: Carl, the drummer for EMERSON, LAKE AND PALMER and ASIA is one of the most respected and influential Rock drummers of all time. Carl is a master of drumming proficiency and unique showmanship. His live drum solos over the years have included his famous use of both gongs and tambourines, as well as his unique ability to extract himself from his t-shirt while playing complex double bass drum patterns.
8. & 9. JOHN BONHAM/KEITH MOON: These two made this list mainly because I cannot ignore the influence they both had upon the modern drummer. I'd be shocked if anyone didn't know who they are since John (LED ZEPPLIN) and KEITH (THE WHO) prett y much seem to bridge over generations. The reason I'm listing them together is that they share the unique contention of being two of the most revered and martyer'd drummers in history. These two were kicking down the barriers of restraint for years and turned the drums into lead intruments when they played. Very few drummers are as widely praised and beloved as these two are. Both passed in their prime and are considered the cream of the crop. Die-hard fans of each of them are prepared to fight to the death that their favorite is the best drummer ever. They'd be WRONG, but they are close to the top. :)
10. STEVE GADD: Steve is a lifetime session/studio drummer who has worked on a TON of albums with the likes of Paul McCartney, Paul Simon, Steely Dan, Al Jarreau, Joe Cocker, Eric Clapton, James Taylor, Jim Croce, The Manhattan Transfer, and many, many, MANY others. Steve is arguably the most recorded drummer in history, as he has been featured on over 600 plus albums. He is widely regarded for his incredible ability to play "in the pocket,"and to groove especially well with the music, and other instruments/musicians he is playing with. In the end, what pushed him onto this list above the Honorable Mentions was that he wrote and performed the incredible drum licks for the Paul Simon song "Fifty-Ways to Leave your Lover" which is one of the coolest drum rythyms EVER.
HONORABLE MENTION: Alan White (YES), Larry Mullen Jr. (U2), Matt Pelissier (MY CHEMICAL ROMANCE), Carmine Appice (VANILLA FUDGE), Steve Smith (JOURNEY), Max Weinberg (BRUCE SPRINGSTEEN AND THE E STREET BAND), Carter Beauford (DAVE MATTHEWS BAND), Mike Cosgrove (ALIEN ANT FARM), Bun E. Carlos (CHEAP TRICK).
So there you go. Ok, go ahead. Argue with me :)
Ok, thanks to my friend Lisa and her post about the latest Van Halen concert she went to and a list of her Top Ten Guitarists, a conversation/debate on said list of guitarists caused Lisa to ask me "and when will I see your top ten Drummers list?"
That sounded like a hell of an idea for a post, so Lisa... here it is. (Oh, and by the way... Lisa's blog can be found at: http://lisamaconfamily.blogspot.com/. Check it out.)
Now... the main thing I had to think about was this: Do I stick to ROCK drummers or try and go out and out for drummers PERIOD?
This was hard. Lisa's guitarist list was limited to guitar players that SHE has personally heard (which is why B.B. King was on MY list, but not HERS, since she had never really listened to King play).
That made sense, so I'm going to follow the same critera, although I will add one other faction: how much of am influence on me a particular drummer had (being that I've been a drummer for the last thirty-two years). If you disagree with my choices and feel I left someone out, it COULD BE because a drummer you'd put on the list is someone I haven't really heard a lot.
I'm thirty-seven and started playing the drums back when I was five. No, I wasn't just mindlessly banging sticks over my head or what-not. I honestly can say I played the drums back when I was five. True Story: My Dad was a one-hit wonder back in the 60s with a band called THE SAND PEPPLES (not to be confused with the R & B trio with the same name). Don't ask me what the song was, I have no idea. It didn't go very high on the top 100 and got them just enough fame to get regular gigs in Manhattan and New Jersey night clubs in the late 60s/very-early 70s. In any case, my father had a drum set set up in our attic along with his trumpet, trombone and other music stuff. My sister and I were constantly told "DO NOT TOUCH MY INSTRUMENTS." The attic was OFF LIMITS and WOE to those of use who disobayed.
The following is a story my father used to delight in telling. I, myself, have VERY LITTLE MEMORY of it. Anyway, at five years old, I was constantly dying to get my hands on that drum set and bang around. One particular spring day, my father was out washing the car in the drive way. For one reason or another, I thought it was the perfect oppertunity to get into the attic and play the drums. You see, at five years old I just did not grasp the concept that SOUND TRAVELS. Dad was outside, and I (and the drum set) was inside, THUS he wouldn't know. Right? Wrong.
So I crept up the stairs, pushed open the door. Sat at the drum set, picked up the sticks and started gleefully banging away.
It didn't take very long for my father to realize someone was inside and touching his precious musical instruments. He threw down the hose and stormed inside. My older sister Anne-Marie, who was most likely heading for the front door to rat me out and score some points with the old man, was standing in the kitchen. That meant my father knew it was me upstairs in direct violation of NESTOR HOUSE RULE #1 ("Thou shalt not touch thine musical instruments upon pain of death and spankings galore").
My father rushed up the stairs, most likely flexing his hands in preperation of a master spanking when halfway up he realized something.
I was keeping a perfect 4/4 time.
He stopped at the top of the stairs (I had no idea he was there because, in accordance of my blantant misunderstanding of the rules of sound, I couldn't hear his stair pounding above the banging of the drums). He stood there and listened. I kept keeping perfect time. I tossed in drum rolls and cymbal crashes and other fills... yet my timing didn't falter.
My father suddenly realized. I had learned to play just by watching him. He had a 5-year old drum-prodigy on his hands.
He slowly opened the door. Who knows how long it took me to relaize he was there. I stopped and froze. I was nailed and my five year old mind was most likely racing to come up with a possible way to blame the entire thing on my sister.
"From now on..." my father said to me. "You are allowed to come up here and play as often as you like." He then closed the door and went back downstairs.
That Christmas, I got my very own Drum Set. I've been playing ever since pretty much.
ANYWAY, I thought my background was important so you can see I have a vested part in this list.
SO... without futher adeu...
1. STEWART COPELAND: Yeah.. like ANYONE is surprised by this. There's a few reasons why I LOVE THE POLICE so much... and Stewart is a huge one. He's crisp, clean and on the money every time. His focusing on cymbal/hi-hat/bass drum style is without a doubt the smoothest I've ever heard (with the number two drummer on my list being the only one to come close). His reggae, jazz, funk, rock and african styles all combine into an unmistakenable sound. He also has a"snap" style (rimshotting focus) that I love. People who I've never met and hear me play have said to me "Your style reminds me of Stewart Copeland." They're right. He's the largest influence on my style as a drummer. There's a reason Stewart is known as "the Rythymist". He's the BEST. EVER.
2. BILL BRUFORD: Bill was the original drummer for YES. Bill combines Jazz technique with rudimentary rock. His ability to take simple parts and rudiments and put them all together into complex pieces is amazing. Bill once said that he "never acquired a drum technique for the sake of acquiring it, but as a solution to a particular problem." and that if he ever heard something that he couldn't do, he would learn how to do it. Anyone questioning how high on this list he should be needs to sit and listen to the Yes album FRAGILE. Amazing stuff.
3. BUDDY RICH: Buddy is has often been called "The World's Greatest Drummer". His talent for rhythm was first noticed by his father (hey! Like me!), who realized thatBuddy was able to keep a steady beat with spoons as a toddler. He began playing drums in vaudeville when he was around two years old as "Traps the Drum Wonder". By the time Buddy was eleven years old he was performing as a bandleader. Buddy supposedly never had a single drum lesson, andhe claimed that any actual drum instruction "would only degrade his musical talent." He also never admitted to practicing, claiming to play the drums only during his live performances. In any case, Buddy was unreal. His speed and ability to do numberous complex rudiments AT THE SAME TIME was unheard of. You name the style... he mastered it.
4. TONY THOMPSON: First off, let's all bow our heads for a drummer that we lost WAY too early, since Tony passed away in 2003 of Kidney Cancer. Tony was in a number of bands (including R&B/dance/disco band CHIC) and did a BUSLOAD of session work on albums by the likes of Madonna (on her 1984 album "Like A Virgin"), Rod Stewart, Robert Palmer, Mick Jagger, and David Bowie (on the "Let's Dance" album and Tony toured with David through-out the "Serious Moonlight Tour" for Let's Dance). Tony was BEST known, however, as the drummer for POWER STATION who had some big hits in 1985 with "Get It On (Bang a Gong)" and "Some Like It Hot". Tony played in a style that combined Fuse, Funk and Rock. His heavy off-tempo tom-tom/snare/bass drum fills were fantastic.
5. NEIL PERT: Neil's work for RUSH is the stuff of legend. He's often been number one on many lists of the greatest drummers and that's fair since the guy is flat out incredible. His style is that of Hard Rock, meshed with Big Band and Jazz. His long and exteme live drum solos at RUSH shows in the mid 80s were stuff that set many a a young fan insane. Over the years, Neil has received a TON of awards for his performances and is highly regarded for his technical proficiency and stamina. Little fun bit of trivia: Neil actually writes most of the lyrics for RUSH's songs. Betcha didn't know that!
6. GINGER BAKER: Ok, here's the part where many of you say "Who?" but Ginger was a pioneer who was probablly the first drummer to use a double bass drum set up instead of a single kick. Ginger played with many groups but is best known as the drummer for CREAM and BLIND FAITH and is one of the greatest fusion drummers ever. He's known for using a variety of other percussion instruments and for his application of African rhythms to much of his drumming. Ginger also HATES being called a 'rock drummer." He prefers to be known as a Jazz drummer.
7. CARL PALMER: Carl, the drummer for EMERSON, LAKE AND PALMER and ASIA is one of the most respected and influential Rock drummers of all time. Carl is a master of drumming proficiency and unique showmanship. His live drum solos over the years have included his famous use of both gongs and tambourines, as well as his unique ability to extract himself from his t-shirt while playing complex double bass drum patterns.
8. & 9. JOHN BONHAM/KEITH MOON: These two made this list mainly because I cannot ignore the influence they both had upon the modern drummer. I'd be shocked if anyone didn't know who they are since John (LED ZEPPLIN) and KEITH (THE WHO) prett y much seem to bridge over generations. The reason I'm listing them together is that they share the unique contention of being two of the most revered and martyer'd drummers in history. These two were kicking down the barriers of restraint for years and turned the drums into lead intruments when they played. Very few drummers are as widely praised and beloved as these two are. Both passed in their prime and are considered the cream of the crop. Die-hard fans of each of them are prepared to fight to the death that their favorite is the best drummer ever. They'd be WRONG, but they are close to the top. :)
10. STEVE GADD: Steve is a lifetime session/studio drummer who has worked on a TON of albums with the likes of Paul McCartney, Paul Simon, Steely Dan, Al Jarreau, Joe Cocker, Eric Clapton, James Taylor, Jim Croce, The Manhattan Transfer, and many, many, MANY others. Steve is arguably the most recorded drummer in history, as he has been featured on over 600 plus albums. He is widely regarded for his incredible ability to play "in the pocket,"and to groove especially well with the music, and other instruments/musicians he is playing with. In the end, what pushed him onto this list above the Honorable Mentions was that he wrote and performed the incredible drum licks for the Paul Simon song "Fifty-Ways to Leave your Lover" which is one of the coolest drum rythyms EVER.
HONORABLE MENTION: Alan White (YES), Larry Mullen Jr. (U2), Matt Pelissier (MY CHEMICAL ROMANCE), Carmine Appice (VANILLA FUDGE), Steve Smith (JOURNEY), Max Weinberg (BRUCE SPRINGSTEEN AND THE E STREET BAND), Carter Beauford (DAVE MATTHEWS BAND), Mike Cosgrove (ALIEN ANT FARM), Bun E. Carlos (CHEAP TRICK).
So there you go. Ok, go ahead. Argue with me :)
Friday, February 15, 2008
STARTED UP A 'BRAND NEW DAY'
I've pretty much stayed away from many chances to comment on the whole Spider-Man ONE MORE DAY/BRAND NEW DAY controversy. However, after reading so much about it I decided to take a little stab at some of the issues I have with the direction Marvel (and mainly Joe Quesada) has decided to take the character in.
I promise this is NOT a mindless rant. There are no barbs, insults, nasty things or comments tossed at anyone. No quarter is taken with anyone in a not-nice manner. Really.
No... really. I swear.
So, one of the things I have heard (read) pounded in at everyone was that the main thing about the series direction is that (and I quote Tom Brevoort here, but I've heard Joe Q and other's say it also) "Spider-Man is about Peter Parker"
Ok, I'm 37, and was a big Spidey fan back in the 70s and 80s before his wedding to Mary-Jane, so it's not like an unmarried Peter is totally foreign to me.
In his "manifesto" in the back of SWING SHIFT: DIRECTORS CUT, Tom presents an arguement that Spider-Man is not the main character here, that Peter Parker is, and that being Spider-Man is just one aspect of the ongoing soap opera of his life. I recently read a well written post on http://www.comicboards.com/smb/ by a guy named JC (No other info on his name was available) that "Ultimate Spider-Man and Spider-Man 2 both get this mix right, with money worries, girl troubles and the pressures of Spidey intruding on Peter’s life." JC went on to say that he "absolutely agree(s) with Tom and think this is something which sets Peter Parker apart from Captain America, Iron Man, Superman, Batman and loads of other super-heroes. Peter is genuinely Peter Parker, with Spider-Man as a mask he puts on – both a release and a burden at the same time. Recent Spidey comics have neglected Peter Parker and his life, instead focusing on Spider-Man (joining the New Avengers and living in the Avengers tower was the most obvious example of this)."
I won't disagree that Peter Parker should be the "main identity" and Spider-Man should come second. However, I has to disagree with any notion that states that is what is happening here.
With the reversal of Peter's marriage Marvel is looking to return the status of Spider-Man to a 'younger" and "more accesable" version.
"Wait!" you say. "Spider-man isn't married anymore? He got divorced?"
No, he did not. Spider-man was never married now.
"Hold it!" you shout. "I saw the 'wedding' at Shea Stadium back in the 80s! I read the issue! He's been married for over twenty-years!"
Uh... well.. yeah, you're right... but...
"But WHAT?" You ask.
OK, side bar... Here's a quick summary for those of you not in the know:
Peter Parker revealed to the whole world that he was Spider-Man as part of his support of a new Super-Hero Registration Act passed by the U.S. Government. Peter later regretted it his support of this bill and decided to ally himself with the band of Super-Hero "rebels" who were against and fighting the Registration Act. Since the world now knew Peter was Spider-Man, one of his older Villains (The Kingpin) hired a hitman to assinate Peter (or anyone close to him if he couldn't get Peter himself). The hitman shot at Peter , but instead the rifle shot hit Peter's Aunt May. May was on life-support and her body could not handle the trauma on her body caused by the shot. Peter tried getting help from everyone he could think of, but had no luck. She was going to die no matter what Peter or anyone else did for her. So, along comes Satan. Yes, Satan. Why did the devil come a'callin? Why, not? So Satan (called Mephisto in the Marvel Universe) approachd Peter and Mary-Jane and told them that he would save May's life, if they would give up their marriage as if it never happened. Sound weird? Yeah to a lot of us too. Bizarrely though, in a four-part story titled ONE MORE DAY, they agree to the devil's terms and a good chunk of their lives are erased from memory, including their marriage, the entire world's knowledge of Spider-Man's secret ID (including even his friends) and his 'organic web-shooters' being gone and him going back to his old mechinical ones. No one will remember that Peter and Mary-Jane were ever married and other parts of their lives will not be remembered... as if it never happened. The change also brought back to life a previous dead character in Peter's best friend Harry Osborn, who died as the 2nd Green Goblin. Why? Who knows. The Devil works in mysterous ways. Oh wait... that's The Lord actually. Well... I don't know then. Don't look at me, it wasn't MY idea. In any case, are we caught up? Yeah? Good. Let's move on.
Peter is also removed from being a teacher (which is what he was doing before he gave up his secret ID to the world but that wouldn't have matter now that his ID WAS a secret again thanks to to the Devil's actions). It seems that as part of this 'revamp" Peter canned be married, or hold a regular job and is basically universally 25 years old.
He's also living in his Aunt's house again cause he has no money and no job. Thus starts BRAND NEW DAY, which is the introduction of the new Status quo for Spider-Man. This storyline is running through the only Spider-Man title left: Amazing Spider-Man which now is published three times a month and is the only ongoing Spider-Man title (if you don't count Ultimate Spider-Man but that's a whole different Universe) left.
So, back to the revelations about Spider-Man... the BIG one, remember is that (and again I quote): "Spider-Man is about Peter Parker."
The problem is this: Tom Brevoort, Joe Quesada, Marvel and just about everyone else completely contridicts themselves here.
Spider-Man is about Peter Parker right? Well, if so, then why does Peter's life basically have to shoe-horn into a very restricting status-quo?
So I'm supposed to believe that a guy could overcome just about every single adversary in his superhero career, including ones that he was so far over his head that he really had no business succeeding in, but he can't figure out how to keep a job?I'm suppossed to accept the fact that despite the fact that Military Personel, Policemen and Women, Firefighters, Public Figures such as politicians, professional athletes and movie/music/TV stars all are able to have and develop serious ongoing relationships that result in marriage, that Peter cannot?
I'm supposed to believe that the guy can't learn from his mistakes? Cause he's making the same ones he was making over and over again. Basically, what Joe Q (and Tom B to an extention) is saying is... Peter is a loser, even though Spider-Man wins most of his battles.
Now before anyone says "No one has said that!"... think about it...
What would you call a guy who cannot keep a job, never has any money, keeps making the same mistakes over and over again, and cannot take a relationship past a particular level? Most people would pretty much call that person a loser... which is pretty much what Joe Q has stated he feels Peter should be .
I have an issue with this. We're suppossed to be able to identify with Peter. He has money issues, and relationship woes, and job issues and all that. Well, hey... I have a full time job (and have never really had a problem holding onto one). I have a wife (and kids) and a great relationship. However, I have have money issues, and relationship woes and job issues.
The age thing? I have no problem with Peter being universally "25" (although I think 27 is a better age seeing how much he's supposed to have been through). The age issue isn't a big deal. However I get the feeling the ONLY reason to have him as 25 is to use the "I'm too young to get married!" excuse.
You can argue all you want that keeping Spider-Man young is the way to get young readers. However, I hate to break this to the powers that be, but most of the YOUNGER (ie: seven years old through say... sixteen years old) couldn't care LESS about Peter being 25 or 27 or 42... and they couldn't care LESS about him being single or holding a job or whatever. They read Spider-Man for the scenes of SPIDER-MAN. Hech, my oldest son, Patrick, is 13. His favorite comic book are Ultimate Spider-Man and Amazing Spider-Man. HE'S pissed that the marriage has been undone. Heck, as a thirteen year old, he's never known Spidey to NOT be married. He knows that even the progression of the (VERY popular and successful) movies makes sure that Peter and Mary Jane's relationship is just about he most important aspect of Peter.
Now most of the OLDER readers (ie: say Eighteen though... say.... Eighty-Five and beyond)... THEY care about Peter's personal life as much as Spider-Man's exploits. However, just how many of them want to see Peter taking that backwards step that he's taken... I don't know there are many.
Another thing I have heard is that the last twenty years of marriage and status quo should not be held onto just for the sake of keeping continuity. I get a kick out of every time I hear something like "continuity is less important than good stories". Everyone loves to kill continuity when they don't like the direction, but hell... without continuity (and new writers STICKING to previously based continuity) things become mash-mashed and hard to follow. Continuity is only as good as the editors and editorial mandates that protect it. Most of the time it's the LACK of good editing that leads to broken continuity and someone having to then go and "fix" problems that usually cause MORE problems than is fixed.
So, yeah it's obvious that I'm on the outs with the direction that Spider-Man has headed into. The road to get here was so "un-Spiderman like" that I still have issues accepting it. The entire thing reeks of Joe Q's insistance that HIS Spider-Man be the only Spider-Man out there, despite the fact we already HAD that Spider-Man in the Ultimate line. Yes, I'm jumping all over JoeQ for this, he has been very vocal over the years that he hated the fact Spider-Man was married. The funny thing is, that much of the things that were undone with this new Status quo is stuff that all happened upder Joe Q's watch! And his pointless and INCORRECT assertation that if we want to see a married Spider-Man we should be reading Spider-Girl would only make sense if Peter was the MAIN CHARACTER of that title... which he is NOT.
I'm giving BRAND NEW DAY a chance. I like Dan Slott as a writer. I like Steve McNiven's and Phil Jiminez's art a lot. I think the '3 times a month' format and the 'only one Spider-Man title' ideas are great. So far, I have not disliked the stories (Five issues have come out so far as of the writing of this blog)... but I will admit there are some big distractions with the 'Harry alive' situation and the reversal of everything I've known about Peter for the last twenty years.
I also wonder, has anyone (characters in the comics I mean) even realized that they suddenly don't know Spider-Man's secret ID but they once did? Wolverine, Norman Osborn and Daredevil just to name a few? How about the New Avengers? Spidey is on a team with them... they knew who he was.
The feel of these issues so far has been that of the older PETER PARKER: THE SPECTACULAR SPIDER-MAN issues from the early 1980s. The stories haven't been bad at all (and the art has been good) but things feel over done to me. They keep pushing the fact Peter has no money and the old "Parker luck" (ie: REALLY BAD LUCK) is referenced way too much. Plus, once again Aunt May has managed to get herself involved (unknowingly of course) with a Super villian. What a shock. It's a wonder she's survived all of these years.
Wait... maybe she hasn't. Maybe May has died a NUMBER of times.
Maybe the devil has done this before and we all just forgot it.
Oh God.
In the end though... don't tell me Spider-Man is ALL ABOUT Peter Parker if you are THEN going to tell me that Peter will NEVER CHANGE OR GROW. That means that Peter Parker is just an aspect of Spider-Man... like a web-shooter... that is there cause it's expected, but will not really hold any effect on the series, since we know he cannot become anything more than he already is.
I've pretty much stayed away from many chances to comment on the whole Spider-Man ONE MORE DAY/BRAND NEW DAY controversy. However, after reading so much about it I decided to take a little stab at some of the issues I have with the direction Marvel (and mainly Joe Quesada) has decided to take the character in.
I promise this is NOT a mindless rant. There are no barbs, insults, nasty things or comments tossed at anyone. No quarter is taken with anyone in a not-nice manner. Really.
No... really. I swear.
So, one of the things I have heard (read) pounded in at everyone was that the main thing about the series direction is that (and I quote Tom Brevoort here, but I've heard Joe Q and other's say it also) "Spider-Man is about Peter Parker"
Ok, I'm 37, and was a big Spidey fan back in the 70s and 80s before his wedding to Mary-Jane, so it's not like an unmarried Peter is totally foreign to me.
In his "manifesto" in the back of SWING SHIFT: DIRECTORS CUT, Tom presents an arguement that Spider-Man is not the main character here, that Peter Parker is, and that being Spider-Man is just one aspect of the ongoing soap opera of his life. I recently read a well written post on http://www.comicboards.com/smb/ by a guy named JC (No other info on his name was available) that "Ultimate Spider-Man and Spider-Man 2 both get this mix right, with money worries, girl troubles and the pressures of Spidey intruding on Peter’s life." JC went on to say that he "absolutely agree(s) with Tom and think this is something which sets Peter Parker apart from Captain America, Iron Man, Superman, Batman and loads of other super-heroes. Peter is genuinely Peter Parker, with Spider-Man as a mask he puts on – both a release and a burden at the same time. Recent Spidey comics have neglected Peter Parker and his life, instead focusing on Spider-Man (joining the New Avengers and living in the Avengers tower was the most obvious example of this)."
I won't disagree that Peter Parker should be the "main identity" and Spider-Man should come second. However, I has to disagree with any notion that states that is what is happening here.
With the reversal of Peter's marriage Marvel is looking to return the status of Spider-Man to a 'younger" and "more accesable" version.
"Wait!" you say. "Spider-man isn't married anymore? He got divorced?"
No, he did not. Spider-man was never married now.
"Hold it!" you shout. "I saw the 'wedding' at Shea Stadium back in the 80s! I read the issue! He's been married for over twenty-years!"
Uh... well.. yeah, you're right... but...
"But WHAT?" You ask.
OK, side bar... Here's a quick summary for those of you not in the know:
Peter Parker revealed to the whole world that he was Spider-Man as part of his support of a new Super-Hero Registration Act passed by the U.S. Government. Peter later regretted it his support of this bill and decided to ally himself with the band of Super-Hero "rebels" who were against and fighting the Registration Act. Since the world now knew Peter was Spider-Man, one of his older Villains (The Kingpin) hired a hitman to assinate Peter (or anyone close to him if he couldn't get Peter himself). The hitman shot at Peter , but instead the rifle shot hit Peter's Aunt May. May was on life-support and her body could not handle the trauma on her body caused by the shot. Peter tried getting help from everyone he could think of, but had no luck. She was going to die no matter what Peter or anyone else did for her. So, along comes Satan. Yes, Satan. Why did the devil come a'callin? Why, not? So Satan (called Mephisto in the Marvel Universe) approachd Peter and Mary-Jane and told them that he would save May's life, if they would give up their marriage as if it never happened. Sound weird? Yeah to a lot of us too. Bizarrely though, in a four-part story titled ONE MORE DAY, they agree to the devil's terms and a good chunk of their lives are erased from memory, including their marriage, the entire world's knowledge of Spider-Man's secret ID (including even his friends) and his 'organic web-shooters' being gone and him going back to his old mechinical ones. No one will remember that Peter and Mary-Jane were ever married and other parts of their lives will not be remembered... as if it never happened. The change also brought back to life a previous dead character in Peter's best friend Harry Osborn, who died as the 2nd Green Goblin. Why? Who knows. The Devil works in mysterous ways. Oh wait... that's The Lord actually. Well... I don't know then. Don't look at me, it wasn't MY idea. In any case, are we caught up? Yeah? Good. Let's move on.
Peter is also removed from being a teacher (which is what he was doing before he gave up his secret ID to the world but that wouldn't have matter now that his ID WAS a secret again thanks to to the Devil's actions). It seems that as part of this 'revamp" Peter canned be married, or hold a regular job and is basically universally 25 years old.
He's also living in his Aunt's house again cause he has no money and no job. Thus starts BRAND NEW DAY, which is the introduction of the new Status quo for Spider-Man. This storyline is running through the only Spider-Man title left: Amazing Spider-Man which now is published three times a month and is the only ongoing Spider-Man title (if you don't count Ultimate Spider-Man but that's a whole different Universe) left.
So, back to the revelations about Spider-Man... the BIG one, remember is that (and again I quote): "Spider-Man is about Peter Parker."
The problem is this: Tom Brevoort, Joe Quesada, Marvel and just about everyone else completely contridicts themselves here.
Spider-Man is about Peter Parker right? Well, if so, then why does Peter's life basically have to shoe-horn into a very restricting status-quo?
So I'm supposed to believe that a guy could overcome just about every single adversary in his superhero career, including ones that he was so far over his head that he really had no business succeeding in, but he can't figure out how to keep a job?I'm suppossed to accept the fact that despite the fact that Military Personel, Policemen and Women, Firefighters, Public Figures such as politicians, professional athletes and movie/music/TV stars all are able to have and develop serious ongoing relationships that result in marriage, that Peter cannot?
I'm supposed to believe that the guy can't learn from his mistakes? Cause he's making the same ones he was making over and over again. Basically, what Joe Q (and Tom B to an extention) is saying is... Peter is a loser, even though Spider-Man wins most of his battles.
Now before anyone says "No one has said that!"... think about it...
What would you call a guy who cannot keep a job, never has any money, keeps making the same mistakes over and over again, and cannot take a relationship past a particular level? Most people would pretty much call that person a loser... which is pretty much what Joe Q has stated he feels Peter should be .
I have an issue with this. We're suppossed to be able to identify with Peter. He has money issues, and relationship woes, and job issues and all that. Well, hey... I have a full time job (and have never really had a problem holding onto one). I have a wife (and kids) and a great relationship. However, I have have money issues, and relationship woes and job issues.
The age thing? I have no problem with Peter being universally "25" (although I think 27 is a better age seeing how much he's supposed to have been through). The age issue isn't a big deal. However I get the feeling the ONLY reason to have him as 25 is to use the "I'm too young to get married!" excuse.
You can argue all you want that keeping Spider-Man young is the way to get young readers. However, I hate to break this to the powers that be, but most of the YOUNGER (ie: seven years old through say... sixteen years old) couldn't care LESS about Peter being 25 or 27 or 42... and they couldn't care LESS about him being single or holding a job or whatever. They read Spider-Man for the scenes of SPIDER-MAN. Hech, my oldest son, Patrick, is 13. His favorite comic book are Ultimate Spider-Man and Amazing Spider-Man. HE'S pissed that the marriage has been undone. Heck, as a thirteen year old, he's never known Spidey to NOT be married. He knows that even the progression of the (VERY popular and successful) movies makes sure that Peter and Mary Jane's relationship is just about he most important aspect of Peter.
Now most of the OLDER readers (ie: say Eighteen though... say.... Eighty-Five and beyond)... THEY care about Peter's personal life as much as Spider-Man's exploits. However, just how many of them want to see Peter taking that backwards step that he's taken... I don't know there are many.
Another thing I have heard is that the last twenty years of marriage and status quo should not be held onto just for the sake of keeping continuity. I get a kick out of every time I hear something like "continuity is less important than good stories". Everyone loves to kill continuity when they don't like the direction, but hell... without continuity (and new writers STICKING to previously based continuity) things become mash-mashed and hard to follow. Continuity is only as good as the editors and editorial mandates that protect it. Most of the time it's the LACK of good editing that leads to broken continuity and someone having to then go and "fix" problems that usually cause MORE problems than is fixed.
So, yeah it's obvious that I'm on the outs with the direction that Spider-Man has headed into. The road to get here was so "un-Spiderman like" that I still have issues accepting it. The entire thing reeks of Joe Q's insistance that HIS Spider-Man be the only Spider-Man out there, despite the fact we already HAD that Spider-Man in the Ultimate line. Yes, I'm jumping all over JoeQ for this, he has been very vocal over the years that he hated the fact Spider-Man was married. The funny thing is, that much of the things that were undone with this new Status quo is stuff that all happened upder Joe Q's watch! And his pointless and INCORRECT assertation that if we want to see a married Spider-Man we should be reading Spider-Girl would only make sense if Peter was the MAIN CHARACTER of that title... which he is NOT.
I'm giving BRAND NEW DAY a chance. I like Dan Slott as a writer. I like Steve McNiven's and Phil Jiminez's art a lot. I think the '3 times a month' format and the 'only one Spider-Man title' ideas are great. So far, I have not disliked the stories (Five issues have come out so far as of the writing of this blog)... but I will admit there are some big distractions with the 'Harry alive' situation and the reversal of everything I've known about Peter for the last twenty years.
I also wonder, has anyone (characters in the comics I mean) even realized that they suddenly don't know Spider-Man's secret ID but they once did? Wolverine, Norman Osborn and Daredevil just to name a few? How about the New Avengers? Spidey is on a team with them... they knew who he was.
The feel of these issues so far has been that of the older PETER PARKER: THE SPECTACULAR SPIDER-MAN issues from the early 1980s. The stories haven't been bad at all (and the art has been good) but things feel over done to me. They keep pushing the fact Peter has no money and the old "Parker luck" (ie: REALLY BAD LUCK) is referenced way too much. Plus, once again Aunt May has managed to get herself involved (unknowingly of course) with a Super villian. What a shock. It's a wonder she's survived all of these years.
Wait... maybe she hasn't. Maybe May has died a NUMBER of times.
Maybe the devil has done this before and we all just forgot it.
Oh God.
In the end though... don't tell me Spider-Man is ALL ABOUT Peter Parker if you are THEN going to tell me that Peter will NEVER CHANGE OR GROW. That means that Peter Parker is just an aspect of Spider-Man... like a web-shooter... that is there cause it's expected, but will not really hold any effect on the series, since we know he cannot become anything more than he already is.
Tuesday, February 12, 2008
WHAT I'M WATCHING
Since the writer's strike is just about done, I thought I'd take a quick look at what I have been (and will be) watching once everything is back to normal. In many cases I caught this stuff on DVD after the fact.
This is in no particular order... I'm just pretty much covering them as they occur to me. In the past I ahev HATED television. I watched one, maybe TWO shows a year (if that). These days? I'm a junkie. God I need help.
JERICHO: I had every intention of trying out this show last year but missed the first two episodes and I decided to wait. I'm only glad I wanted for one reason: watching this on DVD meant I didn't have to wait weeks to know what happened. What a great show. The writing and acting is top notch. Tonight is the season 2 premere and I now have the most prized possession we currently own: a DVR recorder. Last season ended on quite the cliffhanger. Just simple words defined the end of last season. Those words were "Nuts" and "NOW!". We have to see how Jake is going to handle becoming the main man here, although I suspect he'll have some detracters to deal with in the town.
LOST: Anyone who knows me knows that this sort of show is perfect for me. Mystery, a million questions, virial marketing, endless speculation, a tie to the occult, a secret organization... all stuff that fuels my twisted obession-filled nature. So far only two episodes into this season and this are hopping already. I like the direction things are going in and the flash forwards (although there weren't any in the 2nd episode) look to be quite effective. People want their answers but I'm still not pushing for everything to be revealed just yet. I'm enjoying the mystery.
DAMAGES: This looked mildly interesting to me when the promos for it came out, but I didn;t have the time to catch it while the first season was runnning. I recently came out on DVD and decided to check it out (thank GOD for Netflix). Well... this show just blew me away. Glen Close plays a lead character that sits right up there with Vic Mackey as a lead with... shall we say... 'flexable' morals who will do anything... ANYTHING... to achieve their means. Close plays Patti Hughes in a way that makes you think you understand her and even manage to root for her in ways when she shows she is human... but still managed to shock us all in the season finale. I also have neverseen a drama about a law firm where we never (NEVER) see the inside of a court room. This one is hard to classify. Just... check it out if you haven't done so. Powerful stuff and more twists and turns and hidden reveals than an M. Night Shyamalan flick. This show clinched one thing for me: F/X has the BEST shows on TV.
PRISON BREAK: I had finally caught up with Prison Break (a show I fell behind on with only a few episodes left in season 1) just as this season started. As improbable as the premise is, and as much as everyone around me tells me the acting is terrible I cannot get enough of this show. It's fun and crazy and just impossible to predict. The situations and the solutions are sometimes so preposterious that saying it's a stretch is being kind but I don't care. While this doesn't live up to the mystery of LOST, the acting of JERICHO or the power of DAMAGES, it's still a plain cool ride.
NIP/TUCK: Ok... this one is a bit of a cheat because I have only seen the first episode of this season. The rest are all saved on the DVR for when I have some time to catch up. This is always been a show I catch up to after the season is over and this season will be no exception. Like Prison Break, this show is just... well... UP THERE. It's crazy and soap opera-ish and at times you want to shout "Oh, C'mon!" at the screeen, but it's fun and mindless and is eye candy that also delivers some nice twists. The tale of these two best friends (who should have killed each other years ago in my opinion) and partners in a plastic surgery practice is impossible to look away from. Even as you are admiring the view, you're almost embrassed for the characters and the situations they find themselves in, but as with Prison Break.. I don't care.
GREY'S ANATOMY: Now this is the first of my two dirty little guilty pleasures. Even more soap-opera-ish than NIP/TUCK is, this show just screams "EMO!" and "DRAMA!" The fact that everyone in this hospital seems to sleep with someone else from the hospital is actually probablly more realistic than people think. The bad decisions in their personal lives being made on a daily basis by people who make the decisions and actions that save lives everyday is quite an ironic contrast. I was dragged into watching this show... kicking and screaming in fact... it was ALL my wife's fault. She watched it and I would catch a few minutes of it here and there and one night I saw some of the "Bomb" episode from season Two and DAMN I was curious in what happened. So Chrissy talked me into renting the first disk of season one on DVD and I hate to admit it but I was hooked. Oh who am I kidding? It's not her... it's ME! This is just a plain, out and out fun show that I cannot help but enjoy. God, I hate to admit that. And what the HELL is up with Meredith? McDreamy is the PERFECT man! Handsome, smart, funny, honorable, caring, in touch with his emotions... god DAMN I'm not into men and *I'D* marry him! SIGH. See? See what this show does? Argh.
DESPERATE HOUSEWIVES: The other dirty little guilty pleasure. This show is just... mindless. The situations are insane. The storylines are inane. The characters all need a good beating. But jeez... I'm hooked! I think I need to see a Doctor. Hey, do you think Dr. McDreamy sould tream ... errr... forget that.
24: Yeah, I know it's not going to come back until 2009 due to the strike (and it's a victim of it's own format as much as it is a victim of the strike) and I know last season just got... preposterous. But.. it's JACK FREAKING BAUER DAMMIT! God I have enjoyed this show from day one (heh... day... heh) and I'm not about to stop anytime soon. I thought I might lose interest then they killed just about EVERYONE but Jack and Chole a few seasons back... but I didn't. Fun stuff to the end and never... NEVER... discount the POWER OF JACK!
THE SHIELD: Vic Mackey. Is he a realistic character or an over-the-top twisted version? I think he's a bit of both. Vic is a guy who will do anything... ANYTHING... to protect his family and team... but he also has an actual set of morals to him. He's the perfect anti-hero who we cannot help but root for, but we also have to be reminded that he KILLED A FREAKING COP. I have to tell you... this show is as powerful and well acted as anything I have ever seen on TV. I actually missed the last three episodes of last season (and that was the final straw that lead me to get a DVR) so I have to catch up before next season (which is the final season for the show).
RESCUE ME: I'm an extire season behind (and WILL YOU GUYS HURRY UP WITH THE DVD ALREADY!) but this is another show that is brutal and honest and impossible to look away from. Denis Leary's Tommy is a guy that you want to kill one second and then slap on the back and buy a drink for the next. What this character has gone through on this show is rough... and you'd think it was too over the top to be realistic, but it's not. It always seems... right. As WRONG as it gets, it's still 'right'? Know what I mean?
HEROES: Hey, I'm a comic geek. Is ANYONE surprised I love this show? Yeah it stumbled a little with keeping Hiro in the past too long and the annoying Maya and Alejandro plot seemed like it was never going to end but this season finished with a solid BANG and the revelation that a certain someone has his powers back (along with the death of another certain someone) has setup next season quite nicely. Yeah, like 24 we won't see this until next fasll due to the high production on each episode would make it very hard to get more than like three or four episodes done before the summer, but I wouldn't mind a very short set-up to next year.
BATTLESTAR GALACTICA: Another show I am an entire season behind and waiting for the DVD of Season three has been KILLING ME. Jeez... the frigging DVD for RAZOR (the one shot movie for BG) came out a lousy TWO WEEKS after the movie was on the Sci Fi Network, but it took almost 19 months for the season 3 DVD to come out? In any case, this has been quite the show about how people react to being in a situation where all they do is run, fight and live in tin cans in space with a TON of parinoia. The Cylons aren't just bucket's of bolts here... they can look just like humans and no one knows for certain if the guy or gal next to them is actually an enemy. makes for some very interesting situations. I'm glad this season is about to start in March, but I have to scamble to see season 3 in time since it's being released only a few days before the season 4 premere. Nice.
JOURNEYMAN: God I love time travel. I'm facinated by it. And this show handled it very well. This was a cool show that played the QUANTUM LEAP card quite well, only the whole reasoning behind the main character as a time traveler was still unknown. It looks like this show got the axe, which sucks. Chrissy and I really enjoyed this one. Figures. Hopefully this can get a last second repreave, but I doubt it will.
THE BLACK DONNELLYS: Another show that I had to catch up on with DVD and another show that was excellent but was canned. This was pretty much a cross between STATE OF GRACE (the Sean Penn flick) , THE GODFATHER and THE SOPRANOS. Excellent acting and a fairly riveting storyline drove this show but I can tell you the two reasons it eventually failed. 1 - The title. I understand totally why they called it like they did, but the average person with no knowledge of Irish History would not. It's not really a name that grabs you. 2 - No 'name' actor. They needed someone... someone that the general public would say "wow! I know that guy! He was in that flick... or show... or whatever!" James Caan or Ed Harris would have been perfect. The final episode ended on quite a shocking note and you just know the dial was getting turned up in season 2 had there BEEN a season 2. What a shame. If you missed it, check it out on DVD.
So... what does every show I listed have in common? Think about it for a second.
Give up? NO SITCOMS.
I HATE sitcoms. I can stand to watch an episode of one once and while, but overall? I cannot get into them. The last 'SITCOM' I watched every episode of was POLICE SQUAD back in like 1983.
Which brings me to the comedy section of this. NONE of these are something I would consider a sitcom.
FAMILY GUY: Yeah, I don't really care about the cracks that this show is a formulaic mess. All I know is that I laugh every time I watch it. And over-used or not, Stewie is still hysterical.
SOUTH PARK: Matt Stone and Trey Parker are fearless. The show isn't always a gut-buster, but it's always relevant and funny enough that I come back for more.
ROBOT CHICKEN: Talking toys and fucked up sexual-ladden humor. What more can you ask for? Seth Green is a genius.
Since the writer's strike is just about done, I thought I'd take a quick look at what I have been (and will be) watching once everything is back to normal. In many cases I caught this stuff on DVD after the fact.
This is in no particular order... I'm just pretty much covering them as they occur to me. In the past I ahev HATED television. I watched one, maybe TWO shows a year (if that). These days? I'm a junkie. God I need help.
JERICHO: I had every intention of trying out this show last year but missed the first two episodes and I decided to wait. I'm only glad I wanted for one reason: watching this on DVD meant I didn't have to wait weeks to know what happened. What a great show. The writing and acting is top notch. Tonight is the season 2 premere and I now have the most prized possession we currently own: a DVR recorder. Last season ended on quite the cliffhanger. Just simple words defined the end of last season. Those words were "Nuts" and "NOW!". We have to see how Jake is going to handle becoming the main man here, although I suspect he'll have some detracters to deal with in the town.
LOST: Anyone who knows me knows that this sort of show is perfect for me. Mystery, a million questions, virial marketing, endless speculation, a tie to the occult, a secret organization... all stuff that fuels my twisted obession-filled nature. So far only two episodes into this season and this are hopping already. I like the direction things are going in and the flash forwards (although there weren't any in the 2nd episode) look to be quite effective. People want their answers but I'm still not pushing for everything to be revealed just yet. I'm enjoying the mystery.
DAMAGES: This looked mildly interesting to me when the promos for it came out, but I didn;t have the time to catch it while the first season was runnning. I recently came out on DVD and decided to check it out (thank GOD for Netflix). Well... this show just blew me away. Glen Close plays a lead character that sits right up there with Vic Mackey as a lead with... shall we say... 'flexable' morals who will do anything... ANYTHING... to achieve their means. Close plays Patti Hughes in a way that makes you think you understand her and even manage to root for her in ways when she shows she is human... but still managed to shock us all in the season finale. I also have neverseen a drama about a law firm where we never (NEVER) see the inside of a court room. This one is hard to classify. Just... check it out if you haven't done so. Powerful stuff and more twists and turns and hidden reveals than an M. Night Shyamalan flick. This show clinched one thing for me: F/X has the BEST shows on TV.
PRISON BREAK: I had finally caught up with Prison Break (a show I fell behind on with only a few episodes left in season 1) just as this season started. As improbable as the premise is, and as much as everyone around me tells me the acting is terrible I cannot get enough of this show. It's fun and crazy and just impossible to predict. The situations and the solutions are sometimes so preposterious that saying it's a stretch is being kind but I don't care. While this doesn't live up to the mystery of LOST, the acting of JERICHO or the power of DAMAGES, it's still a plain cool ride.
NIP/TUCK: Ok... this one is a bit of a cheat because I have only seen the first episode of this season. The rest are all saved on the DVR for when I have some time to catch up. This is always been a show I catch up to after the season is over and this season will be no exception. Like Prison Break, this show is just... well... UP THERE. It's crazy and soap opera-ish and at times you want to shout "Oh, C'mon!" at the screeen, but it's fun and mindless and is eye candy that also delivers some nice twists. The tale of these two best friends (who should have killed each other years ago in my opinion) and partners in a plastic surgery practice is impossible to look away from. Even as you are admiring the view, you're almost embrassed for the characters and the situations they find themselves in, but as with Prison Break.. I don't care.
GREY'S ANATOMY: Now this is the first of my two dirty little guilty pleasures. Even more soap-opera-ish than NIP/TUCK is, this show just screams "EMO!" and "DRAMA!" The fact that everyone in this hospital seems to sleep with someone else from the hospital is actually probablly more realistic than people think. The bad decisions in their personal lives being made on a daily basis by people who make the decisions and actions that save lives everyday is quite an ironic contrast. I was dragged into watching this show... kicking and screaming in fact... it was ALL my wife's fault. She watched it and I would catch a few minutes of it here and there and one night I saw some of the "Bomb" episode from season Two and DAMN I was curious in what happened. So Chrissy talked me into renting the first disk of season one on DVD and I hate to admit it but I was hooked. Oh who am I kidding? It's not her... it's ME! This is just a plain, out and out fun show that I cannot help but enjoy. God, I hate to admit that. And what the HELL is up with Meredith? McDreamy is the PERFECT man! Handsome, smart, funny, honorable, caring, in touch with his emotions... god DAMN I'm not into men and *I'D* marry him! SIGH. See? See what this show does? Argh.
DESPERATE HOUSEWIVES: The other dirty little guilty pleasure. This show is just... mindless. The situations are insane. The storylines are inane. The characters all need a good beating. But jeez... I'm hooked! I think I need to see a Doctor. Hey, do you think Dr. McDreamy sould tream ... errr... forget that.
24: Yeah, I know it's not going to come back until 2009 due to the strike (and it's a victim of it's own format as much as it is a victim of the strike) and I know last season just got... preposterous. But.. it's JACK FREAKING BAUER DAMMIT! God I have enjoyed this show from day one (heh... day... heh) and I'm not about to stop anytime soon. I thought I might lose interest then they killed just about EVERYONE but Jack and Chole a few seasons back... but I didn't. Fun stuff to the end and never... NEVER... discount the POWER OF JACK!
THE SHIELD: Vic Mackey. Is he a realistic character or an over-the-top twisted version? I think he's a bit of both. Vic is a guy who will do anything... ANYTHING... to protect his family and team... but he also has an actual set of morals to him. He's the perfect anti-hero who we cannot help but root for, but we also have to be reminded that he KILLED A FREAKING COP. I have to tell you... this show is as powerful and well acted as anything I have ever seen on TV. I actually missed the last three episodes of last season (and that was the final straw that lead me to get a DVR) so I have to catch up before next season (which is the final season for the show).
RESCUE ME: I'm an extire season behind (and WILL YOU GUYS HURRY UP WITH THE DVD ALREADY!) but this is another show that is brutal and honest and impossible to look away from. Denis Leary's Tommy is a guy that you want to kill one second and then slap on the back and buy a drink for the next. What this character has gone through on this show is rough... and you'd think it was too over the top to be realistic, but it's not. It always seems... right. As WRONG as it gets, it's still 'right'? Know what I mean?
HEROES: Hey, I'm a comic geek. Is ANYONE surprised I love this show? Yeah it stumbled a little with keeping Hiro in the past too long and the annoying Maya and Alejandro plot seemed like it was never going to end but this season finished with a solid BANG and the revelation that a certain someone has his powers back (along with the death of another certain someone) has setup next season quite nicely. Yeah, like 24 we won't see this until next fasll due to the high production on each episode would make it very hard to get more than like three or four episodes done before the summer, but I wouldn't mind a very short set-up to next year.
BATTLESTAR GALACTICA: Another show I am an entire season behind and waiting for the DVD of Season three has been KILLING ME. Jeez... the frigging DVD for RAZOR (the one shot movie for BG) came out a lousy TWO WEEKS after the movie was on the Sci Fi Network, but it took almost 19 months for the season 3 DVD to come out? In any case, this has been quite the show about how people react to being in a situation where all they do is run, fight and live in tin cans in space with a TON of parinoia. The Cylons aren't just bucket's of bolts here... they can look just like humans and no one knows for certain if the guy or gal next to them is actually an enemy. makes for some very interesting situations. I'm glad this season is about to start in March, but I have to scamble to see season 3 in time since it's being released only a few days before the season 4 premere. Nice.
JOURNEYMAN: God I love time travel. I'm facinated by it. And this show handled it very well. This was a cool show that played the QUANTUM LEAP card quite well, only the whole reasoning behind the main character as a time traveler was still unknown. It looks like this show got the axe, which sucks. Chrissy and I really enjoyed this one. Figures. Hopefully this can get a last second repreave, but I doubt it will.
THE BLACK DONNELLYS: Another show that I had to catch up on with DVD and another show that was excellent but was canned. This was pretty much a cross between STATE OF GRACE (the Sean Penn flick) , THE GODFATHER and THE SOPRANOS. Excellent acting and a fairly riveting storyline drove this show but I can tell you the two reasons it eventually failed. 1 - The title. I understand totally why they called it like they did, but the average person with no knowledge of Irish History would not. It's not really a name that grabs you. 2 - No 'name' actor. They needed someone... someone that the general public would say "wow! I know that guy! He was in that flick... or show... or whatever!" James Caan or Ed Harris would have been perfect. The final episode ended on quite a shocking note and you just know the dial was getting turned up in season 2 had there BEEN a season 2. What a shame. If you missed it, check it out on DVD.
So... what does every show I listed have in common? Think about it for a second.
Give up? NO SITCOMS.
I HATE sitcoms. I can stand to watch an episode of one once and while, but overall? I cannot get into them. The last 'SITCOM' I watched every episode of was POLICE SQUAD back in like 1983.
Which brings me to the comedy section of this. NONE of these are something I would consider a sitcom.
FAMILY GUY: Yeah, I don't really care about the cracks that this show is a formulaic mess. All I know is that I laugh every time I watch it. And over-used or not, Stewie is still hysterical.
SOUTH PARK: Matt Stone and Trey Parker are fearless. The show isn't always a gut-buster, but it's always relevant and funny enough that I come back for more.
ROBOT CHICKEN: Talking toys and fucked up sexual-ladden humor. What more can you ask for? Seth Green is a genius.
Tuesday, January 22, 2008
SOMETHING HAS FOUND US
Holy shit. It sure has.
(Writer's note: the following is fairly spoiler free until a certain point towards the end of this post. I'll warn you all beforehand at the proper spot when to stop reading if you haven't seen the movie and do not wish to be spoiled. I don't wish to ruin the experiance for anyone. Ok? ok.)
By now, unless you're sharing a cave in the middle east with Osama Bin Ladin (and maybe even then), you've heard of Cloverfield.
Being the obesssive little shit I am when something grabs my attention and won't let go, I've been fairly knee deep in the viral advertising for this flick for the last few months.
I saw the trailer, like everyone else, when Chrissy (my wife and best friend for you new comers) and I took our kids to see TRANSFORMERS (it in itself was a decent flick that was actually better than I expected it to be, although I didn't love it. It was ok.).
Anyway, the trailer ran on the screen without a title and I was immediately struck by two things.
1- It seemed to be a much larger and ambitious "home video"/Blair Witch type flick. I fucking LOVE this type of film. The Blair Witch Project, The Last Broadcast, Interview with the Assassin, Cannibal Holocaust, Series 7... the idea of a 'fake' documentry or an 'event' caught on a video camera is a cool idea and not used as often as people seem to think.
2 - What we saw was nothing short of... well... FUCKING AWESOME LOOKING.
Wow. I'm using 'fuck' a lot so far. You'd think all of these years of writing and college and what not would lead me to use a less 'colorful' pronoun. Then again, sometimes there is no better word to use to get a point across that carries the neccessary weight.
Ah well. Fuck it (see?).
So... we see the trailer... I loved it, Chrissy liked it.. hell even Pat (my oldest who has recently turned 13... Jesus... I have a teenager... someone help me) thought it looked "cool".
Since there was no title on the trailer, I wound up looking up "Un-named J.J Abrams project" online and found a few things about it. Sites like "Project Cloverfield", "CloverfieldNews", "CloverfieldClues", Aint It Cool News, Dark Horizions and Newsarama all had something.
Then I discovered http://www.1-18-08.com/.
It seemed to be connected to the movie. All it had was two pictures on it. One of a close up of two women staring up at something that obviously is shocking them. The other of a party and someone drinking.
Over the next week or so, a third, then a fourth picture would find it's way onto the webite. Then, I discovered you could actually move and even "flip" the pictures. Two of them wound up having writing on the back.
Rumors of the movies titles came and went. Monsterous was one. Furious was another (both turned out to just be words on different verisons of the movie posters). Cloverfield, Overnight, Parasite, Chocolate Outrage (don't ask) and even Terrifying were all rumored to be the title. Of course, in the end it was Cloverfield (which by the way has NO hidden meaning... it's the name of the street leading up to Abrams offices and one that he just liked the sound of. The U.S. Government uses the term 'Cloverfield' as the name of the mission in the film from what I understand.)
A very cool movie poster eventually came to be outed. Take a look:
So, with all of this vague information, things slowed down a little. After that, my buddy Tom discovered (and told me about) http://www.slusho.jp/
Now viral marketing is not a new thing to a J.J. Abrams connected project. As a LOST fan, I have played with and seen many of the websites and items attached to LOST (The Hanso Corperation website, etc) , although I never got halfway as far as Tom did. The Slusho website was bizarre and it held some possible clues. Slusho is a frozen drink (pretty much like a Slurpee, Icee or Squishee) from Japan (which, from the trailer for the film, I knew was where "Rob" was going for his new job)
That website eventually led to http://tagruato.jp/, which is the company that owns and produces Slusho. They also own and operate a number of oil rigs in the oceans and had recently launched a satellite into space.
That led me to seeing that the site was 'hacked' by a 'greenpeace' type group called TIDOO (Tagruato Is Destroying Our Oceans) who wound up with their own website (http://www.tidowave.com/) and trying to expose things about Tagruato's secret ajenda including the fact that one of their oil rigs (The Chaui Station, which is the one closest ot New York by the way) is not really there for oil.
Eventually, another viral website was discovered called http://www.jamieandteddy.com/ which is a 'personal' site created by a girl named Jamie so she can send personal videos to her boyfriend Teddy who is away 'fighting for the cause' and 'saving the world'. Well, the 'Jamie' on here is one of the party goers depicted at the beginning of the trailer. Her boyfriend is onvolved with TIDO and is on a 'mission' to expose Tagruato. If you can figure out the password (I couldn't, but I got the password from one of the fan sites... it was http://www.cloverfieldnews.com/ actually) that was 'jllovesth' you could download and view a number of messages that Jamie recorded and left for Teddy. The tie in to the flick gets to be more obvious in the later videos. Jamie herself is in the movie, only briefly, but she is in it.
Curiouser and curiouser.
SO... what the heck does all of this mean?
Well, like The Blair Witch Project, the advertising and promotions for this movie were brilliant. People were frothing at the mouth for new information. As time went by, more bizarre clues and possible connections started to come out.
A 'news report' come out telling of the destruction of the Tagruato oil rig closest to the coast of New York. Tagruato released a press release blaming the situation on a terrorist attack by the group TIDO. TIDO denied it and claimed it was Tagruato that did it themselves in a cover-up. The footage from the news report is very well done and there are some 'camera phone' videos caught of the incedent that are pretty wild. To top it off, there were a number of 'newscasts' done in different langauges with different new agencies to make it more realistic.
Then the CEO of Tagruato traveled to New York. On January 17th, he was ambused by a group of TIDO protestors but managed to fight them off.
So, with all of this crazy stuff... maybe we should finally get to the movie itself?
Ok, like I promised up top, I'm going to warn people of spoilers. You can relax. I'm not quite there yet.
With all of the hype, all of the waiting and all of the crazy marketing involved, there was no way the film could live up to the high expectations I had placed on it. Right?
Right?
Wrong. The movie was, to continue to use my colorful adverb, FUCKING AWESOME.
I loved it. LOVED IT. I wasn't alone. Chrissy loved it. Every person I saw the film with loved it. It was a big hit to the crowd in the theatre.
It was as intense of a film as I have ever seen. Once the scene shown in the trailer (of the partygoers on the roof seeing the explosion at the edge of the city) happens the movie shifts into a roller-coaster ride and it never stops. Not once. At NO point do you sit back and say to yourself "ok, let's move here... please get going." You have no time to do this. There is really no slow parts, no calm down period. There is a slight point where you have a small break in the action and it lasts a few monites but it's an emotional scene and works well. You are never bored. You never have a chance to question anything cause the film just NEVER LOSES MOMENTUM. It goes faster and faster until a hell of a scene that even if you feel you know is coming is still a hell of a jolt.
Yeah there's a few 'shakey cam' moments and yeah you have to use quite the medicom of disbelief that Hud (the guy with the video camera) would actually carry the damn thing the entire time, even when doing somethings that would be awkward while holding the camera.
Who fricken cares? The film was great. So you have to take a few things with a grain of salt.
For all of those who get into the "It's not realistic that he'd carry the camera the whole time."... well... IT'S A MOVIE. Is it realistic that New York could be attacked by something unexplanable and devistaed so?
If you're going to get caught up on the negative of it being a 'home video' movie, then you will not like this film... but trust me, the format its shot in makes the movie SO MUCH MORE ENJOYABLE. If it was done as a traditional movie it would have lost a lot of it's luster and would just be another horror survival flick.
The big plus for this is that it's not from the point of view of "up above" like all movies are. There is no Army General, no scientist with answers, no President demanding facts... it's not Godzilla or King Kong or Independance Day. It's all from the point of view from the people in the streets who are directly in the path of what is happening. It's seeing the events from the ground... not from above like most movies are.
I, for one, think the entire thing is brilliant.
Ok, that was my spoiler free section of my review. Now, let's discuss a bit of the film itself. Ok, all of you have who not seen the flick but have gotten this far... GET OUT.
Go.
Shoo.
Vamoose.
Disperse.
Still there? You were warned. Don't come crying to me.
Ok, first off not only was the monster fucking cool looking, but the little 'spider' like ones in the subway just were nasty and horrifying little things.
There were six scenes that just blew my mind.
1 - The main hook from the trailer of the head of the Statue of Liberty hitting the street and rolling thrugh it before coming to a rest. Amazing.
2 - The bridge. When Jason is standing on the edge and that tenticle (or whatever it was) hits the bridge... jeez.
3 - The subway tunnel. As soon as Rob says to Hud "Doesn't that thing have night vision?" Every fricking person in the theatre had to know what was coming, and I think we all did. And we all jumped anyway. One of the most frenzied scenes I have ever seen in a movie.
4 - The scene in the makeshift hospital when they realize that Melania was bitten. "We have a bite!' someone screams. The shot of her silolutte expanding and then exploding in a mist of blood while there are screams and shouts was unreal.
5 - The helicopter crash. Terrifying, realistic and painful. Listening to Hud scream "Please God, please God, please God!" was heartwrenching. Seeing his point of view as the ground got closer and closer made my heart stop. It honestly made me feel like we were in the helicopter with them.
6 - The shot of the monster right above Hud, then it eating him. Ouch.
In the end, it was Chrissy who noticed that on the background of the last scene (when the tape kicked back to the older recording of Rob and Beth on the ferris wheel at Coney Island) that something falls from the sky into the ocean.
We all stayed through the credits. I was convinced that something would happen at the total end of the credits. I was right. A dark screen. Static. What sounds like breathing. Then someone whispers what sounds like "Help us."
Apparently that's not all it says. According to a few different websites, when the audio is played backwards it says "It's still alive."
Unbelievable. This movie was fantastic. I cannot express how much I enjoyed it. All of it... every last part. Just a great job.
The two words I keep thinking best to descibe this movie are intense and frenzied. No words better fit.
Wednesday, October 03, 2007
Sick Cycle Carousel
Well it's been a few days and I feel strong enough to talk about the Mets and their historic fall from grace.
There's a lot to say... is anyone surprised?
First off, to those of you who called or emailed me about my mental and physical health on Sunday... thank you. I handled it MUCH better than I would have expected.
That in itself is a warning sign though... I got (no exaggeration) nineteen phone calls and seven emails between Sunday afternoon and Monday noontime. I guess my passion for this team is so well known by the people I have regular (or even semi-regular) contact with that everyone knew there good odds that I had a breakdown, hi-jacked a dump truck, climbed a water tower and went all Charles Whitman on central Centereach.
As I stated in previous posts, I have often taken this shit WAY too seriously... and I admit I had no less than three major meltdowns in the last two weeks of the baseball season. The night they blew two seperate three tun leads to the Marlins (including one in the bottom of the ninth) was a particuarly violent and... um... energetic outburst.
Which made me take a loooong and serious look in the mirror. In no way is a baseball game ever going to be important enough in life to elict that sort of reaction.
I actually handled the last weekend very well. At that point I realized how shot the bullpen was and that even if they had gotten into the playoffs, odds are that their pitching would not have held up enought to get very far.
So... first off, YES I am still a Mets fan... despite my black humor spouted in frustration about changing teams, there is no way this would ever happen. I bleed blue -n- orange and always will.
Second, I do NOT think this team is shot and done as presently constructed. No major overhall is needed. They do not have to rip apart the team and start with 65% new players. Changes must be made... yes. Some more drastic than others, but the main part of the should stay mostly intact. (I will get into more detail in a minute).
Third, I do not think Willie Randolph should be fired despite my insistance over the last three weeks that he should be. Getting past my initial anger... I think Willie is a good manager overall who really needs to learn how to manage a bullpen better (but hey, Joe Torre never learned and look where he's gotten the last eleven years) and he deserves a shot to lead this team next year.
This year should have never been in doubt. The team should have basically wrapped up the division back in July like they did last year. The problem was that except for the month of April and that little 12 game run or so right after the four-game sweep by Philly in Philly, there seemed to be very little urgancy to this team. They seemed to think they were so good that the division was a foregone conclusion. Well, you see what that got them. They seemed to believe their own press. Rarely is that a good thing.
The funny thing is... the Mets did not deserve to make the playoffs because of their horrible 5 -12 record down the stretch, but in reality, this team was still the best in the NL. They could/should have won 95 games or so and really could have cut through the NL Pennant rather easily.
Could've/should've. All twisted in the wind are our shattered dreams of could've/should've.
So, yeah... this team had a busload of talent... but like the teams of the eighties that finished in second place 5 out of 7 years, talent isn't enough.
As much as I freaking HATE the %#$@&^! Phillies, that team played with heart and grit and looked a LOT like last years Mets team.
That's what this year's team was missing for a huge chunk of the season. Heart and grit.
They need that back. They need to realize that you cannot turn it on and off like a switch. Maybe the Yankees of the late Nineties could, but hey... they won four freaking World Series in five years.The Mets? They have won nothing but one division and one playoff series since 2000. They have no basis acting like the top dog.
Woof, freaking woof.
The main problem with being a Mets fan (and what this season was an epitomy of) is that nasty, creeping, nagging feeling that things are about to go belly up and in the worst way possible. It's rare (ie: 1969, 1986) that a season goes just perfect. Even excellent seasons like 1988, 1999, 2000 and 2006 eneded in disapointment in the playoffs. The 1999 (which was really a better team than the 2000 squad that made it to the World Series) and 2006 teams were both great teams that really had the ability (and should have) won it all.
As a Mets fan I've fallen victim to many near misses. 1984, 1985, 1987, 1989, 1990, 1998, and 2001 all were years the Mets were right there... the playoffs in their grasp, only for it to slip away at the last moment. 1998 was particuarly bad because the Mets went into the last five games of the season leading the wild card by 1 1/2 games. They lost their final five games of the season against the Montreal Expos at home and the Atlanta Braves on the road. If they had won just ONE of those games, the Mets could have forced a three-way wild card tie. If they had won two, they would have won the wild card outright. Ironic, seeing as how the Expos became the Washington Nationals and the Nationals won 5 out of 6 games at the end of this season (while they then went and lost 4 out of 6 to the Phillies) in helping the Mets complete their collapse.
Even in 1999 the Mets almost blew it. They were swept by Philly in the last two weeks of the season and lost their wild card lead and actually needed the Brewers to take 2 of 3 from the Reds in the last weekend to finish in a tie that forced a one game playoff with Cincinnati for the wild card.
Despite this regular sick cycle of near misses and last minute disasters, I love this team. The Mets are the perpetual underdogs and always will be.
It's never easy with them. Never. Then again, either is life. Why should it be?
That's why when I hear Yankee fans bitching about firing Joe Torre and booing A-Rod and such I want to slap the shit out of them. Yankee fans have NO idea how good they have it. No team in any sport wins as much as the Yankees do. I think Yankee fans should never be allowed to bitch about their team. 26 World Championships and a shit-load of playoff appearances has spoiled their fans. It's also made many of them act like they are better than everyone else just because they follow and root for the Bronx.
Hey, it's fucking EASY to follow and root for a franchise that is always in contention and wins much more often than it loses. Staying a fan of a franchise that usually does NOT win (ie: The Mets, Cubs, and hell, even those lucky as hell Phillies) shows REAL fandom.
Ok. So... this team.
Despite things... I'm not blind. The Mets biggest problem this year was the bullpen which just plain out and out SUCKED the last six to eight weeks of the season, which was a shame because it was so damn good the first half. The inconsitancy in the offense didn't help. The manner of play without urgancy was the other largest problem.
Well, besides Willie's inability to manage the bullpen.
So... what has to change? What MUST happen for next years team to win the division again?
I have ten simple steps.
1 - Give David Wright the "C": No one, and I mean NO ONE on this team was more stand-up and professional than Wright. While guys like Glavine, Alou, Wagner and Lo Duca rarely ducked the media and were willing to give shit to team-mates who under performed or had their head up their asses, Wright was the team spokesman and backbone. He was, without any doubt, the team MVP (and would have been the NL MVP had the Mets won the division, now it will go to Jimmy Rollins or Matt Holiday... God, I hope It's Holiday... I fucking HATE Jimmy Rollins and his arrogant smirking face... I want to smack that fucking grin right off his kisser with a fastball) and he picked up the role at age 24 that guys like Carlos Beltran and Carlos Delgado should have, but never did. He led, by example on and off the field. He is the team leader. Make it offical. Number 5 should be the Mets captain.
2 - Play more small ball: This team lead the majors in steals for the second year in a row. Reyes, Gomez, Chavez, Wright, Beltran, just to name a few, have loads of speed... yes I didn't see ONE squeeze playthis year. Not ONE. Do you know how many times the Mets left runners at third with less than two outs? A lot. Get Reyes to hit the ball on the ground again like he did last year and the beginning of this year. Bunt, steal, move the runners. Create runs. This team is built for it. Imagine the '85 Cardinals just with more home run power. This team should lead the NL in runs easily.
3 - Get Tony Bernazard out of the $&$%#! clubhouse: I'm convinced that Bernazard is a huge problem and creates a gap between Wille and some players and even give some players a more direct line to the GM. He shouldn't be in there. It's Willie's show... step back and let him run it.
4 - Hire Rudy Jaramillo as the hitting coach: Rick Downs wasn't the answer and while the offense did pick up after the Hojo/Rickey show came to town, it was WAY too inconsistant. Jaramillo is the best in the business. He'd be a big key to help players from falling into those maddening cycles where they can't even do the basics like hitting a fly ball to drive in a run at third with less than two outs.
5 - Make sure Ambiorix Burgos and Duaner Sanchez are healthy by spring training: Kill the Brian Bannister trade all you want, but no one was screaming when that trade was made. In fact, many people were saying the Mets had way too many pitchers like Bannister in Maine, Perez, Pelfry, etc... I was sorry we went... I liked him... but I was also excited about the potential of Burgos in the bullpen. Burgos, Sanchez, Filiciano, Hielman and Wagner is a pretty damn good bullpen if everyone is healthy. With Sosa as a long relief guy and one more new arm (Scott Linebrink? Jeremy Affeldt? How about taking a chance on Kerry Wood?) in the bullpen I honestly believe the relief corps will be in pretty good shape.
6 - Let the following go: Tom Glavine - It's obvious he was pining for Atlanta to finish his career. He was a good guy for this team at one time but that time has passed. Let him go 8-6 with a 4.21 ERA in Atlanta and retire next year as a Brave, where he really belongs. No hard feelings here at all. Glavine stepped it up at times and was a strong presence here and often came through when the Mets needed him, but he really has no place in NY anymore. Lastings Milledge - This kid has a lot of talent and I see him eventually becoming a kind of Garret Anderson type... but he is a million dollar talent with a ten cent head. I think New York will not be right for him. Trade him to the A's for one of their pitchers or to the Dodgers for one of theirs or make him one of the peices of a blockbuster trade if possible... but I think the kid needs to go. Let Gomez be the young outfielder to play next year. Mota - No one, and I mean NO ONE will accept him in a trade. He was beyond miserable... he was a perfect disaster. All you Yankee fans who screamed at Kyle Farnsworth all year? Farnsworth was fucking Mariano Rivera compared to Mota. The Mets need to send the message that constant failure will not be tolerated. Worst performance ever. Back in 2006 I never imagined I'd be more sickened by Mota than I used to be when Mel Rojas entered a game. Rickey Henderson - Ricky was great for Roger Cedano back in '99 but did anyone else notice that Reyes' gradual decent into lethartic play started not too long after Ricky came on board? I think that Ricky actually convinced Reyes that to "save himself" for the whole season he should occasionally "rest himself" during games... basically dogging it. Next year let him in spring training for two weeks as a baserunning instructor them get him the hell away from the younger players. Paul Lo Duca - This one was the toughest to list... I love Lo Duca's manner and would actually be happy if he returned, but after thinking about it I think that it makes more sense to have Ramon Castro be the everyday catcher next year and save the money. Lo Duca is a great clubhouse guy and a great stand up player. He's a guy to emulate and thank god David Wright seemed to take after him in attitude. I love the way he approaches that game, but in the end his numbers were not really very good. Save the money for pitching and give Castro, who hit better and threw out runners better, the everyday job.
7 - Keep the following: Moises Alou - He's not an everyday player anymore but the guy was just amazing when he played. You figure he'll miss at least 40 games to the DL and another 10-15 to just needing rest. Don't count on him as a regular. Put him in the Julio Franco role of mentor, big time pinch hitter and let him start twice a week. Think Bernie Williams circa 2005. I think he'd be invaluable. El Duque - Like Alou, keep him with the though that he will NOT be the guy you lean on as one of your top four starters. In fact, I love the idea of him as the long Relief guy, but have him in the mix as one of your possible number five starters and see what happens. Like Clemens I think Duque would benefit from a short season. Don't have him on the active roster till July. Marlon Anderson - Damn did this guy come through in big spots or WHAT? The Cardinals must be kicking themsleves and wondering what the hell woke him up. He was clutch for the Mets in 2005 and again in 2007. He thrives here. Keep him. Him and Alou gives the Mets a great duo to shape the bench around.
8 - Let the kids develop and start giving them definded roles: Let Mike Pelfrey and Philip Humber know that at least one of them will be a starter next year. Let them know the other will be a bullpen guy who will be groomed to be a major bullpen arm as a set up or possibily even a future closer down the line. Let them compete in spring training and get some youth into the pitching staff. Let Carlos Gomez and Rubin Gotay play. Give Fernando Martinez some big league time. Get this freaking team younger.
9 - Change the average attitude and get some "Wright" players in here: One guy who is a free agent this upcoming year that would be perfect for the Mets? Aaron Rowand. The guy freaking OOZES hustle. This is a player in the mode of a Lenny Dykstra. I would have LOVED a guy like Eric Byrnes to still be available. Andy Pettitte would be amazing for this team (even though the odds he'd decline the player option for the Yankees for '08 and sign with the Mets is roughly somewhere less than 0%) Shannon Stewart might be a good fit. How about Tori Hunter? I know if would create another Beltran/Cameron situation with two centerfielders out there, but it's a thought.
10 - Find a way to get Johan Santana, Roy Halladay or Roy Oswalt: The rumor is that all three are available for the right price. The Rumors also saythat right price is a King's Ransom for any of them, especially Santana. I don't frigging care. If healthy, Pedro will be a legitimate Number one (ok, maybe 1 - A is a better description) for the most part, and Maine and Perez are both very solid guys who would fall in the grey area between a #2 and #3 starting pitcher. I'd plan on one of the rookies in Pelfry and Hubner being a starter... but the Mets need a huge 1 -2 punch like Santana/Pedro or Oswalt/Pedro. It would cost something like Gomez, Hubner and Fernando Martinez just to start... but you know what? It would be worth it.
BONUS FANTASY INSANE IDEA - Ok, this is a crazy and ridculous idea... but how would this be for a total shocker? Bear with me for a second:
Sign Alex Rodriguez when (and we all know he will cause of Boras) he opts out of his Yankee contact.
Insane? Yep. Stupid? Maybe not so much. Think about it.
You would do one of two things after this move.
1 - Move David Wright to 2nd base or Left Field. He's athletic. He has good instincts. He has speed. It worked great for Edgardo Alfonzo. Wright has already stated he would be more than willing to move if the Mets ever wanted to sign A-Rod. A-Rod is a better fielder at 3rd. Hell, the Yanks have won with two straight lousy fielding second basemen in Soriano and Cano (c'mon Yankee fans, you KNOW they both are HORRIBLE fielders). Wright would be better at 2nd than either of them. Imagine a line up with Reyes, Wright, A-Rod, Beltran, Delgado and Alou in it.
OR
2 - Trade Carlos Delgado and move Wright to First. A team like the Dodgers, the Reds, The Padres, The Angels, The Orioles, The Blue Jays and the Rangers all could use a major upgrade at first base. Hell, How about Delgado, Hubner, and another player plus cash to the Jays for Halladay? Far fatched? Maybe.
All crazy right? I don't even know if I like the idea and I came up with it.
But wow... that line up. OUCH.
WOO HOO.
Anyway...
Ok, enough of that for now. So...
2007 PLAYOFF PREDICTIONS (yeah I'll do it anyway, even with the Mets out of it)
Red Sox vs. Angels: Rough one. Two really good teams. Problem is, the Sox have the Angels number in the same way the Angels have the Yanks number. Staff ace John Lackey is horrible against Boston lifetime. Close call... most likely the best series of the first round. Red Sox in five.
Yankees vs. Indians: Bronx fans think this is a layup. It's not. The Cards went 2-4 against the Padres and Mets each last year and beat both in the playoffs. The Tigers didn't do overly well against the Yanks last year in the regular season and you remember what happened there. The Indians are a good team and if the Yanks overlook them they'll be sorry. The Yanks also have seriously suspect starting pitching. It's Pettitte and Wang and pray for... um... err... Pong. Clemens isn't healthy and hasn't pitched well when he's been on the mound, Mussiana is highly suspect and Hughes/Kennedy are unknown rookie quantities. However, The Yanks are the overall stronger team and the suddenly strong bullpen will help although it will be interesting to see how Chamberlain does with the Joba rules tossed out the window. Yanks in five.
Cubs vs. Diamondbacks: Wow... no one saw the D-Backs comin did they? Everyone looked at the Dodgers and Padres and ignored Arizona and everyone paid for it. Webb has established himself in a league with Oswalt and Peavy as one of the best NL pitchers. The team is solid, if unspectacular. I freaking LOVE Eric Byrnes. He could play for my team ANYDAY. However, Sweet Lou and the Cubbies have some Karma flowin and I can feel it shaking in their direction. I see some big games out of Lee and Soriano and some good pitching out of Zambrano and Lilly. Dempster holds it together, if just barely. Cubs in four.
Phillies vs. Rockies: Gad, I hate the Phillies. This should be the Mets vs the Rockies. However, even if it was, it might not have mattered. The Rockies are firing on all cylanders and the Phils aren't playing the dregs like Washington and Florida now. The Phillies starters were doing it with mirrors the last two weeks and now that's pretty much over. The offense is great with Utley, Rowand, Rollins and Howard leading the charge, but like the Mets, this team falls into little weird inconsistant slumps and Howard is as likely to strike out three times a game as he is to hit a home run. The Rockies will ride that strong wave (that saw them go 14-1 down the stretch) through this series and the Phils will realize that the smoke and mirrors magic is gone. There's no team to collapse and hand them anything this time. Rockies in four.
Well it's been a few days and I feel strong enough to talk about the Mets and their historic fall from grace.
There's a lot to say... is anyone surprised?
First off, to those of you who called or emailed me about my mental and physical health on Sunday... thank you. I handled it MUCH better than I would have expected.
That in itself is a warning sign though... I got (no exaggeration) nineteen phone calls and seven emails between Sunday afternoon and Monday noontime. I guess my passion for this team is so well known by the people I have regular (or even semi-regular) contact with that everyone knew there good odds that I had a breakdown, hi-jacked a dump truck, climbed a water tower and went all Charles Whitman on central Centereach.
As I stated in previous posts, I have often taken this shit WAY too seriously... and I admit I had no less than three major meltdowns in the last two weeks of the baseball season. The night they blew two seperate three tun leads to the Marlins (including one in the bottom of the ninth) was a particuarly violent and... um... energetic outburst.
Which made me take a loooong and serious look in the mirror. In no way is a baseball game ever going to be important enough in life to elict that sort of reaction.
I actually handled the last weekend very well. At that point I realized how shot the bullpen was and that even if they had gotten into the playoffs, odds are that their pitching would not have held up enought to get very far.
So... first off, YES I am still a Mets fan... despite my black humor spouted in frustration about changing teams, there is no way this would ever happen. I bleed blue -n- orange and always will.
Second, I do NOT think this team is shot and done as presently constructed. No major overhall is needed. They do not have to rip apart the team and start with 65% new players. Changes must be made... yes. Some more drastic than others, but the main part of the should stay mostly intact. (I will get into more detail in a minute).
Third, I do not think Willie Randolph should be fired despite my insistance over the last three weeks that he should be. Getting past my initial anger... I think Willie is a good manager overall who really needs to learn how to manage a bullpen better (but hey, Joe Torre never learned and look where he's gotten the last eleven years) and he deserves a shot to lead this team next year.
This year should have never been in doubt. The team should have basically wrapped up the division back in July like they did last year. The problem was that except for the month of April and that little 12 game run or so right after the four-game sweep by Philly in Philly, there seemed to be very little urgancy to this team. They seemed to think they were so good that the division was a foregone conclusion. Well, you see what that got them. They seemed to believe their own press. Rarely is that a good thing.
The funny thing is... the Mets did not deserve to make the playoffs because of their horrible 5 -12 record down the stretch, but in reality, this team was still the best in the NL. They could/should have won 95 games or so and really could have cut through the NL Pennant rather easily.
Could've/should've. All twisted in the wind are our shattered dreams of could've/should've.
So, yeah... this team had a busload of talent... but like the teams of the eighties that finished in second place 5 out of 7 years, talent isn't enough.
As much as I freaking HATE the %#$@&^! Phillies, that team played with heart and grit and looked a LOT like last years Mets team.
That's what this year's team was missing for a huge chunk of the season. Heart and grit.
They need that back. They need to realize that you cannot turn it on and off like a switch. Maybe the Yankees of the late Nineties could, but hey... they won four freaking World Series in five years.The Mets? They have won nothing but one division and one playoff series since 2000. They have no basis acting like the top dog.
Woof, freaking woof.
The main problem with being a Mets fan (and what this season was an epitomy of) is that nasty, creeping, nagging feeling that things are about to go belly up and in the worst way possible. It's rare (ie: 1969, 1986) that a season goes just perfect. Even excellent seasons like 1988, 1999, 2000 and 2006 eneded in disapointment in the playoffs. The 1999 (which was really a better team than the 2000 squad that made it to the World Series) and 2006 teams were both great teams that really had the ability (and should have) won it all.
As a Mets fan I've fallen victim to many near misses. 1984, 1985, 1987, 1989, 1990, 1998, and 2001 all were years the Mets were right there... the playoffs in their grasp, only for it to slip away at the last moment. 1998 was particuarly bad because the Mets went into the last five games of the season leading the wild card by 1 1/2 games. They lost their final five games of the season against the Montreal Expos at home and the Atlanta Braves on the road. If they had won just ONE of those games, the Mets could have forced a three-way wild card tie. If they had won two, they would have won the wild card outright. Ironic, seeing as how the Expos became the Washington Nationals and the Nationals won 5 out of 6 games at the end of this season (while they then went and lost 4 out of 6 to the Phillies) in helping the Mets complete their collapse.
Even in 1999 the Mets almost blew it. They were swept by Philly in the last two weeks of the season and lost their wild card lead and actually needed the Brewers to take 2 of 3 from the Reds in the last weekend to finish in a tie that forced a one game playoff with Cincinnati for the wild card.
Despite this regular sick cycle of near misses and last minute disasters, I love this team. The Mets are the perpetual underdogs and always will be.
It's never easy with them. Never. Then again, either is life. Why should it be?
That's why when I hear Yankee fans bitching about firing Joe Torre and booing A-Rod and such I want to slap the shit out of them. Yankee fans have NO idea how good they have it. No team in any sport wins as much as the Yankees do. I think Yankee fans should never be allowed to bitch about their team. 26 World Championships and a shit-load of playoff appearances has spoiled their fans. It's also made many of them act like they are better than everyone else just because they follow and root for the Bronx.
Hey, it's fucking EASY to follow and root for a franchise that is always in contention and wins much more often than it loses. Staying a fan of a franchise that usually does NOT win (ie: The Mets, Cubs, and hell, even those lucky as hell Phillies) shows REAL fandom.
Ok. So... this team.
Despite things... I'm not blind. The Mets biggest problem this year was the bullpen which just plain out and out SUCKED the last six to eight weeks of the season, which was a shame because it was so damn good the first half. The inconsitancy in the offense didn't help. The manner of play without urgancy was the other largest problem.
Well, besides Willie's inability to manage the bullpen.
So... what has to change? What MUST happen for next years team to win the division again?
I have ten simple steps.
1 - Give David Wright the "C": No one, and I mean NO ONE on this team was more stand-up and professional than Wright. While guys like Glavine, Alou, Wagner and Lo Duca rarely ducked the media and were willing to give shit to team-mates who under performed or had their head up their asses, Wright was the team spokesman and backbone. He was, without any doubt, the team MVP (and would have been the NL MVP had the Mets won the division, now it will go to Jimmy Rollins or Matt Holiday... God, I hope It's Holiday... I fucking HATE Jimmy Rollins and his arrogant smirking face... I want to smack that fucking grin right off his kisser with a fastball) and he picked up the role at age 24 that guys like Carlos Beltran and Carlos Delgado should have, but never did. He led, by example on and off the field. He is the team leader. Make it offical. Number 5 should be the Mets captain.
2 - Play more small ball: This team lead the majors in steals for the second year in a row. Reyes, Gomez, Chavez, Wright, Beltran, just to name a few, have loads of speed... yes I didn't see ONE squeeze playthis year. Not ONE. Do you know how many times the Mets left runners at third with less than two outs? A lot. Get Reyes to hit the ball on the ground again like he did last year and the beginning of this year. Bunt, steal, move the runners. Create runs. This team is built for it. Imagine the '85 Cardinals just with more home run power. This team should lead the NL in runs easily.
3 - Get Tony Bernazard out of the $&$%#! clubhouse: I'm convinced that Bernazard is a huge problem and creates a gap between Wille and some players and even give some players a more direct line to the GM. He shouldn't be in there. It's Willie's show... step back and let him run it.
4 - Hire Rudy Jaramillo as the hitting coach: Rick Downs wasn't the answer and while the offense did pick up after the Hojo/Rickey show came to town, it was WAY too inconsistant. Jaramillo is the best in the business. He'd be a big key to help players from falling into those maddening cycles where they can't even do the basics like hitting a fly ball to drive in a run at third with less than two outs.
5 - Make sure Ambiorix Burgos and Duaner Sanchez are healthy by spring training: Kill the Brian Bannister trade all you want, but no one was screaming when that trade was made. In fact, many people were saying the Mets had way too many pitchers like Bannister in Maine, Perez, Pelfry, etc... I was sorry we went... I liked him... but I was also excited about the potential of Burgos in the bullpen. Burgos, Sanchez, Filiciano, Hielman and Wagner is a pretty damn good bullpen if everyone is healthy. With Sosa as a long relief guy and one more new arm (Scott Linebrink? Jeremy Affeldt? How about taking a chance on Kerry Wood?) in the bullpen I honestly believe the relief corps will be in pretty good shape.
6 - Let the following go: Tom Glavine - It's obvious he was pining for Atlanta to finish his career. He was a good guy for this team at one time but that time has passed. Let him go 8-6 with a 4.21 ERA in Atlanta and retire next year as a Brave, where he really belongs. No hard feelings here at all. Glavine stepped it up at times and was a strong presence here and often came through when the Mets needed him, but he really has no place in NY anymore. Lastings Milledge - This kid has a lot of talent and I see him eventually becoming a kind of Garret Anderson type... but he is a million dollar talent with a ten cent head. I think New York will not be right for him. Trade him to the A's for one of their pitchers or to the Dodgers for one of theirs or make him one of the peices of a blockbuster trade if possible... but I think the kid needs to go. Let Gomez be the young outfielder to play next year. Mota - No one, and I mean NO ONE will accept him in a trade. He was beyond miserable... he was a perfect disaster. All you Yankee fans who screamed at Kyle Farnsworth all year? Farnsworth was fucking Mariano Rivera compared to Mota. The Mets need to send the message that constant failure will not be tolerated. Worst performance ever. Back in 2006 I never imagined I'd be more sickened by Mota than I used to be when Mel Rojas entered a game. Rickey Henderson - Ricky was great for Roger Cedano back in '99 but did anyone else notice that Reyes' gradual decent into lethartic play started not too long after Ricky came on board? I think that Ricky actually convinced Reyes that to "save himself" for the whole season he should occasionally "rest himself" during games... basically dogging it. Next year let him in spring training for two weeks as a baserunning instructor them get him the hell away from the younger players. Paul Lo Duca - This one was the toughest to list... I love Lo Duca's manner and would actually be happy if he returned, but after thinking about it I think that it makes more sense to have Ramon Castro be the everyday catcher next year and save the money. Lo Duca is a great clubhouse guy and a great stand up player. He's a guy to emulate and thank god David Wright seemed to take after him in attitude. I love the way he approaches that game, but in the end his numbers were not really very good. Save the money for pitching and give Castro, who hit better and threw out runners better, the everyday job.
7 - Keep the following: Moises Alou - He's not an everyday player anymore but the guy was just amazing when he played. You figure he'll miss at least 40 games to the DL and another 10-15 to just needing rest. Don't count on him as a regular. Put him in the Julio Franco role of mentor, big time pinch hitter and let him start twice a week. Think Bernie Williams circa 2005. I think he'd be invaluable. El Duque - Like Alou, keep him with the though that he will NOT be the guy you lean on as one of your top four starters. In fact, I love the idea of him as the long Relief guy, but have him in the mix as one of your possible number five starters and see what happens. Like Clemens I think Duque would benefit from a short season. Don't have him on the active roster till July. Marlon Anderson - Damn did this guy come through in big spots or WHAT? The Cardinals must be kicking themsleves and wondering what the hell woke him up. He was clutch for the Mets in 2005 and again in 2007. He thrives here. Keep him. Him and Alou gives the Mets a great duo to shape the bench around.
8 - Let the kids develop and start giving them definded roles: Let Mike Pelfrey and Philip Humber know that at least one of them will be a starter next year. Let them know the other will be a bullpen guy who will be groomed to be a major bullpen arm as a set up or possibily even a future closer down the line. Let them compete in spring training and get some youth into the pitching staff. Let Carlos Gomez and Rubin Gotay play. Give Fernando Martinez some big league time. Get this freaking team younger.
9 - Change the average attitude and get some "Wright" players in here: One guy who is a free agent this upcoming year that would be perfect for the Mets? Aaron Rowand. The guy freaking OOZES hustle. This is a player in the mode of a Lenny Dykstra. I would have LOVED a guy like Eric Byrnes to still be available. Andy Pettitte would be amazing for this team (even though the odds he'd decline the player option for the Yankees for '08 and sign with the Mets is roughly somewhere less than 0%) Shannon Stewart might be a good fit. How about Tori Hunter? I know if would create another Beltran/Cameron situation with two centerfielders out there, but it's a thought.
10 - Find a way to get Johan Santana, Roy Halladay or Roy Oswalt: The rumor is that all three are available for the right price. The Rumors also saythat right price is a King's Ransom for any of them, especially Santana. I don't frigging care. If healthy, Pedro will be a legitimate Number one (ok, maybe 1 - A is a better description) for the most part, and Maine and Perez are both very solid guys who would fall in the grey area between a #2 and #3 starting pitcher. I'd plan on one of the rookies in Pelfry and Hubner being a starter... but the Mets need a huge 1 -2 punch like Santana/Pedro or Oswalt/Pedro. It would cost something like Gomez, Hubner and Fernando Martinez just to start... but you know what? It would be worth it.
BONUS FANTASY INSANE IDEA - Ok, this is a crazy and ridculous idea... but how would this be for a total shocker? Bear with me for a second:
Sign Alex Rodriguez when (and we all know he will cause of Boras) he opts out of his Yankee contact.
Insane? Yep. Stupid? Maybe not so much. Think about it.
You would do one of two things after this move.
1 - Move David Wright to 2nd base or Left Field. He's athletic. He has good instincts. He has speed. It worked great for Edgardo Alfonzo. Wright has already stated he would be more than willing to move if the Mets ever wanted to sign A-Rod. A-Rod is a better fielder at 3rd. Hell, the Yanks have won with two straight lousy fielding second basemen in Soriano and Cano (c'mon Yankee fans, you KNOW they both are HORRIBLE fielders). Wright would be better at 2nd than either of them. Imagine a line up with Reyes, Wright, A-Rod, Beltran, Delgado and Alou in it.
OR
2 - Trade Carlos Delgado and move Wright to First. A team like the Dodgers, the Reds, The Padres, The Angels, The Orioles, The Blue Jays and the Rangers all could use a major upgrade at first base. Hell, How about Delgado, Hubner, and another player plus cash to the Jays for Halladay? Far fatched? Maybe.
All crazy right? I don't even know if I like the idea and I came up with it.
But wow... that line up. OUCH.
WOO HOO.
Anyway...
Ok, enough of that for now. So...
2007 PLAYOFF PREDICTIONS (yeah I'll do it anyway, even with the Mets out of it)
Red Sox vs. Angels: Rough one. Two really good teams. Problem is, the Sox have the Angels number in the same way the Angels have the Yanks number. Staff ace John Lackey is horrible against Boston lifetime. Close call... most likely the best series of the first round. Red Sox in five.
Yankees vs. Indians: Bronx fans think this is a layup. It's not. The Cards went 2-4 against the Padres and Mets each last year and beat both in the playoffs. The Tigers didn't do overly well against the Yanks last year in the regular season and you remember what happened there. The Indians are a good team and if the Yanks overlook them they'll be sorry. The Yanks also have seriously suspect starting pitching. It's Pettitte and Wang and pray for... um... err... Pong. Clemens isn't healthy and hasn't pitched well when he's been on the mound, Mussiana is highly suspect and Hughes/Kennedy are unknown rookie quantities. However, The Yanks are the overall stronger team and the suddenly strong bullpen will help although it will be interesting to see how Chamberlain does with the Joba rules tossed out the window. Yanks in five.
Cubs vs. Diamondbacks: Wow... no one saw the D-Backs comin did they? Everyone looked at the Dodgers and Padres and ignored Arizona and everyone paid for it. Webb has established himself in a league with Oswalt and Peavy as one of the best NL pitchers. The team is solid, if unspectacular. I freaking LOVE Eric Byrnes. He could play for my team ANYDAY. However, Sweet Lou and the Cubbies have some Karma flowin and I can feel it shaking in their direction. I see some big games out of Lee and Soriano and some good pitching out of Zambrano and Lilly. Dempster holds it together, if just barely. Cubs in four.
Phillies vs. Rockies: Gad, I hate the Phillies. This should be the Mets vs the Rockies. However, even if it was, it might not have mattered. The Rockies are firing on all cylanders and the Phils aren't playing the dregs like Washington and Florida now. The Phillies starters were doing it with mirrors the last two weeks and now that's pretty much over. The offense is great with Utley, Rowand, Rollins and Howard leading the charge, but like the Mets, this team falls into little weird inconsistant slumps and Howard is as likely to strike out three times a game as he is to hit a home run. The Rockies will ride that strong wave (that saw them go 14-1 down the stretch) through this series and the Phils will realize that the smoke and mirrors magic is gone. There's no team to collapse and hand them anything this time. Rockies in four.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
